TY - JOUR
T1 - Silicon as a plant defence against insect herbivory
T2 - response to Massey, Ennos & Hartley
AU - Keeping, Malcolm G
AU - Reynolds, Olivia
N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Journal of Animal Ecology. ISSNs: 0021-8790;
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - Summary 1. Silicon (Si) has received increased attention as a nutrient capable of providing some measure of defence for plants against fungal pathogens, and insect and mammalian herbivores.2. On the basis of a study including two generalist insect folivores and a phloem feeder, Massey, Ennos & Hartley (2006) have drawn attention to a putative distinction between the effects of plant Si in defending against folivorous and phloem-feeding insects, implying on the basis of their results that phloem feeders are less likely to be adversely affected by increased plant Si than folivores.3. However, in making this suggestion, Massey et al. (2006) have ignored many previous studies demonstrating a clear effect of plant Si on a range of phloem-feeding and some xylem-feeding insects, and that this effect stems not only from leaf mechanical properties based on opaline silica, but also from induced chemical defences seemingly mediated by soluble Si.4. Furthermore, Massey et al. cannot claim that their study was the first demonstration of a direct effect of Si on insect herbivore preference and performance; there have been numerous earlier studies demonstrating this from folivores, stem borers, and phloem and xylem feeders.5. We contend that current evidence indicates that Si is likely to be involved to a similar extent in enhancing resistance to all four insect feeding guilds and that any conclusion to the contrary is, at this stage, premature.
AB - Summary 1. Silicon (Si) has received increased attention as a nutrient capable of providing some measure of defence for plants against fungal pathogens, and insect and mammalian herbivores.2. On the basis of a study including two generalist insect folivores and a phloem feeder, Massey, Ennos & Hartley (2006) have drawn attention to a putative distinction between the effects of plant Si in defending against folivorous and phloem-feeding insects, implying on the basis of their results that phloem feeders are less likely to be adversely affected by increased plant Si than folivores.3. However, in making this suggestion, Massey et al. (2006) have ignored many previous studies demonstrating a clear effect of plant Si on a range of phloem-feeding and some xylem-feeding insects, and that this effect stems not only from leaf mechanical properties based on opaline silica, but also from induced chemical defences seemingly mediated by soluble Si.4. Furthermore, Massey et al. cannot claim that their study was the first demonstration of a direct effect of Si on insect herbivore preference and performance; there have been numerous earlier studies demonstrating this from folivores, stem borers, and phloem and xylem feeders.5. We contend that current evidence indicates that Si is likely to be involved to a similar extent in enhancing resistance to all four insect feeding guilds and that any conclusion to the contrary is, at this stage, premature.
KW - Biotic stressors
KW - Herbivore performance
KW - Induced defence
KW - Mechanical barrier
KW - Plant resistance
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01380.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01380.x
M3 - Article
SN - 0021-8790
VL - 77
SP - 631
EP - 633
JO - Journal of Animal Ecology
JF - Journal of Animal Ecology
IS - 3
ER -