Social acceptability of a duty of care for biodiversity

Gillian Earl, Allan Curtis, Catherine Allan, Simon McDonald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Biodiversity in Australia continues to decline despite substantial government efforts to promote conservation. A statutory duty of care for biodiversity could promote positive outcomes and complement existing regulatory and voluntary approaches. Interest in a duty of care has been persistent, but progress elusive. Two inter-related issues around the social acceptability of a statutory duty of care are impeding progress: (a) the absence of a practical framework to facilitate its implementation, and (b)concerns about the acceptability of a legal instrument to landholders. In this paper, we present research that, for the first time in Australia, addresses the social acceptability of a duty of care for biodiversity, drawing on data from surveys in two Victorian regions. Our findings suggest that there is broad acceptance of 'duty of care' as an abstract concept, but diminished support for its detailed implications. Farmers, in particular, are concerned about the potential for wider community input, the prospect of a legally defined instrument, and the use of industry standards as a surrogate measure for compliance with a duty of care. These findings suggest that efforts to introduce a statutory duty of care need to engage farmers closely.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)8-17
Number of pages10
JournalAustralasian Journal of Environmental Management
Volume17
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2010

Fingerprint

biodiversity
voluntary approach
regulatory approach
compliance
farmer
industry
conservation
acceptance
community

Cite this

@article{207e9c07e7de482aa590d00e772f9928,
title = "Social acceptability of a duty of care for biodiversity",
abstract = "Biodiversity in Australia continues to decline despite substantial government efforts to promote conservation. A statutory duty of care for biodiversity could promote positive outcomes and complement existing regulatory and voluntary approaches. Interest in a duty of care has been persistent, but progress elusive. Two inter-related issues around the social acceptability of a statutory duty of care are impeding progress: (a) the absence of a practical framework to facilitate its implementation, and (b)concerns about the acceptability of a legal instrument to landholders. In this paper, we present research that, for the first time in Australia, addresses the social acceptability of a duty of care for biodiversity, drawing on data from surveys in two Victorian regions. Our findings suggest that there is broad acceptance of 'duty of care' as an abstract concept, but diminished support for its detailed implications. Farmers, in particular, are concerned about the potential for wider community input, the prospect of a legally defined instrument, and the use of industry standards as a surrogate measure for compliance with a duty of care. These findings suggest that efforts to introduce a statutory duty of care need to engage farmers closely.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Australia, Biodiversity, Duty of care, Policy instruments, Regional catchment management, Social acceptability",
author = "Gillian Earl and Allan Curtis and Catherine Allan and Simon McDonald",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = March 2010; Journal title (773t) = Australasian Journal of Environmental Management. ISSNs: 1448-6563;",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "8--17",
journal = "Australasian Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "1448-6563",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

Social acceptability of a duty of care for biodiversity. / Earl, Gillian; Curtis, Allan; Allan, Catherine; McDonald, Simon.

In: Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 03.2010, p. 8-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social acceptability of a duty of care for biodiversity

AU - Earl, Gillian

AU - Curtis, Allan

AU - Allan, Catherine

AU - McDonald, Simon

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = March 2010; Journal title (773t) = Australasian Journal of Environmental Management. ISSNs: 1448-6563;

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Biodiversity in Australia continues to decline despite substantial government efforts to promote conservation. A statutory duty of care for biodiversity could promote positive outcomes and complement existing regulatory and voluntary approaches. Interest in a duty of care has been persistent, but progress elusive. Two inter-related issues around the social acceptability of a statutory duty of care are impeding progress: (a) the absence of a practical framework to facilitate its implementation, and (b)concerns about the acceptability of a legal instrument to landholders. In this paper, we present research that, for the first time in Australia, addresses the social acceptability of a duty of care for biodiversity, drawing on data from surveys in two Victorian regions. Our findings suggest that there is broad acceptance of 'duty of care' as an abstract concept, but diminished support for its detailed implications. Farmers, in particular, are concerned about the potential for wider community input, the prospect of a legally defined instrument, and the use of industry standards as a surrogate measure for compliance with a duty of care. These findings suggest that efforts to introduce a statutory duty of care need to engage farmers closely.

AB - Biodiversity in Australia continues to decline despite substantial government efforts to promote conservation. A statutory duty of care for biodiversity could promote positive outcomes and complement existing regulatory and voluntary approaches. Interest in a duty of care has been persistent, but progress elusive. Two inter-related issues around the social acceptability of a statutory duty of care are impeding progress: (a) the absence of a practical framework to facilitate its implementation, and (b)concerns about the acceptability of a legal instrument to landholders. In this paper, we present research that, for the first time in Australia, addresses the social acceptability of a duty of care for biodiversity, drawing on data from surveys in two Victorian regions. Our findings suggest that there is broad acceptance of 'duty of care' as an abstract concept, but diminished support for its detailed implications. Farmers, in particular, are concerned about the potential for wider community input, the prospect of a legally defined instrument, and the use of industry standards as a surrogate measure for compliance with a duty of care. These findings suggest that efforts to introduce a statutory duty of care need to engage farmers closely.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Australia

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Duty of care

KW - Policy instruments

KW - Regional catchment management

KW - Social acceptability

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 8

EP - 17

JO - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Australasian Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 1448-6563

IS - 1

ER -