37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper analyses several concepts of social capital to show what meanings have been constructed around the phrase, 'social capital.' By looking at the roots of 'social' and capital,' it demonstrates that the use of the phrase 'social capital' is an inappropriate one. The phrase does not fit the phenomenon it tries to explain. Ideological roots of 'capital' suggest that it is individualistic, that despite multiplication it tends to accumulate and concentrate often through exploitative means, and that it follows paths of gender and class discrimination. On the other hand, the phenomenon, which the phrase social capital captures, does not tend towards the individualistic, but to the social. It multiplies and spreads to families, communities, and groups. It also does not concentrate or accumulate like capital. By analyzing such contradictions in the phrase, the paper explores appropriate alternatives and suggests implications for policy and practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-226
Number of pages16
JournalSocial Science Journal
Volume43
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

social capital
Economics
discrimination
Social Capital
gender
community
Group

Cite this

Pawar, Manohar. / Social ""Capital""?. In: Social Science Journal. 2006 ; Vol. 43, No. 2. pp. 211-226.
@article{2f0431736f58484b88399e05b9b5bef0,
title = "Social {"}{"}Capital{"}{"}?",
abstract = "This paper analyses several concepts of social capital to show what meanings have been constructed around the phrase, 'social capital.' By looking at the roots of 'social' and capital,' it demonstrates that the use of the phrase 'social capital' is an inappropriate one. The phrase does not fit the phenomenon it tries to explain. Ideological roots of 'capital' suggest that it is individualistic, that despite multiplication it tends to accumulate and concentrate often through exploitative means, and that it follows paths of gender and class discrimination. On the other hand, the phenomenon, which the phrase social capital captures, does not tend towards the individualistic, but to the social. It multiplies and spreads to families, communities, and groups. It also does not concentrate or accumulate like capital. By analyzing such contradictions in the phrase, the paper explores appropriate alternatives and suggests implications for policy and practice.",
author = "Manohar Pawar",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = The Social Science Journal. ISSNs: 0362-3319;",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1016/j.soscij.2006.02.002",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "211--226",
journal = "Social Science Journal",
issn = "0362-3319",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Social ""Capital""? / Pawar, Manohar.

In: Social Science Journal, Vol. 43, No. 2, 2006, p. 211-226.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social ""Capital""?

AU - Pawar, Manohar

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = The Social Science Journal. ISSNs: 0362-3319;

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This paper analyses several concepts of social capital to show what meanings have been constructed around the phrase, 'social capital.' By looking at the roots of 'social' and capital,' it demonstrates that the use of the phrase 'social capital' is an inappropriate one. The phrase does not fit the phenomenon it tries to explain. Ideological roots of 'capital' suggest that it is individualistic, that despite multiplication it tends to accumulate and concentrate often through exploitative means, and that it follows paths of gender and class discrimination. On the other hand, the phenomenon, which the phrase social capital captures, does not tend towards the individualistic, but to the social. It multiplies and spreads to families, communities, and groups. It also does not concentrate or accumulate like capital. By analyzing such contradictions in the phrase, the paper explores appropriate alternatives and suggests implications for policy and practice.

AB - This paper analyses several concepts of social capital to show what meanings have been constructed around the phrase, 'social capital.' By looking at the roots of 'social' and capital,' it demonstrates that the use of the phrase 'social capital' is an inappropriate one. The phrase does not fit the phenomenon it tries to explain. Ideological roots of 'capital' suggest that it is individualistic, that despite multiplication it tends to accumulate and concentrate often through exploitative means, and that it follows paths of gender and class discrimination. On the other hand, the phenomenon, which the phrase social capital captures, does not tend towards the individualistic, but to the social. It multiplies and spreads to families, communities, and groups. It also does not concentrate or accumulate like capital. By analyzing such contradictions in the phrase, the paper explores appropriate alternatives and suggests implications for policy and practice.

U2 - 10.1016/j.soscij.2006.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.soscij.2006.02.002

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 211

EP - 226

JO - Social Science Journal

JF - Social Science Journal

SN - 0362-3319

IS - 2

ER -