Social capital in rural Australia

Margaret Alston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Third Sector Research Conference in Dublin in 2000. In Australia, as in the rest of the industrialised world, social capital has been identified as a key element in rural regeneration. For example, the Prime Minister, John Howard, speaks openly of the need for a 'social coalition' between communities, governments and businesses that will build social cohesion and trust at community level. For two decades successive Australian governments have followed the world-wide trend in industrialised nations to devolve responsibility for social welfare programs to local areas and to nongovernment agencies, the stated rationale being to break down welfare dependency and to promote individual responsibility. The dismantling of the welfare state and the triumph of capitalism have been defining features of the Australian landscape in recent years. Meanwhile globalising trends have had significant effects on Australian rural people. Rural populations have higher rates of aging and ill health and many rural areas are experiencing increasing levels of poverty and unemployment. It would appear that there has never been a more important time to increase social capital in rural areas. However, government policies of devolution, privatisation and managerialism have been formulated with free market principles as the dominant determinant and with little apparent consideration of the effects on social capital. Services are being withdrawn in many rural areas and in others, NGOs report being overloaded and underfunded. There is widespread acceptance of the view that Australian rural people are becoming more socially isolated and alienated. This paper will examine social capital in Australian rural areas drawing on a case study conducted in a small country town in 2001.It will look at the need to match rhetoric with action and will discuss social policy initiatives that have impacted on the development of social capital.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-104
Number of pages12
JournalRural Society
Volume12
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2002

Fingerprint

social capital
rural area
devolution
social policy
rural population
capitalism
privatization
unemployment
cohesion
nongovernmental organization
poverty
regeneration
Social capital
market
Rural areas
responsibility
trend
effect
Responsibility
Government

Cite this

Alston, M. (2002). Social capital in rural Australia. Rural Society, 12(2), 93-104.
Alston, Margaret. / Social capital in rural Australia. In: Rural Society. 2002 ; Vol. 12, No. 2. pp. 93-104.
@article{6306ebb70e3941f4b0396d16e06969c5,
title = "Social capital in rural Australia",
abstract = "An earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Third Sector Research Conference in Dublin in 2000. In Australia, as in the rest of the industrialised world, social capital has been identified as a key element in rural regeneration. For example, the Prime Minister, John Howard, speaks openly of the need for a 'social coalition' between communities, governments and businesses that will build social cohesion and trust at community level. For two decades successive Australian governments have followed the world-wide trend in industrialised nations to devolve responsibility for social welfare programs to local areas and to nongovernment agencies, the stated rationale being to break down welfare dependency and to promote individual responsibility. The dismantling of the welfare state and the triumph of capitalism have been defining features of the Australian landscape in recent years. Meanwhile globalising trends have had significant effects on Australian rural people. Rural populations have higher rates of aging and ill health and many rural areas are experiencing increasing levels of poverty and unemployment. It would appear that there has never been a more important time to increase social capital in rural areas. However, government policies of devolution, privatisation and managerialism have been formulated with free market principles as the dominant determinant and with little apparent consideration of the effects on social capital. Services are being withdrawn in many rural areas and in others, NGOs report being overloaded and underfunded. There is widespread acceptance of the view that Australian rural people are becoming more socially isolated and alienated. This paper will examine social capital in Australian rural areas drawing on a case study conducted in a small country town in 2001.It will look at the need to match rhetoric with action and will discuss social policy initiatives that have impacted on the development of social capital.",
author = "Margaret Alston",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = July 2002; Journal title (773t) = Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia. ISSNs: 1037-1656;",
year = "2002",
month = "7",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "93--104",
journal = "Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia",
issn = "1037-1656",
publisher = "eContent Management Pty Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Alston, M 2002, 'Social capital in rural Australia', Rural Society, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 93-104.

Social capital in rural Australia. / Alston, Margaret.

In: Rural Society, Vol. 12, No. 2, 07.2002, p. 93-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social capital in rural Australia

AU - Alston, Margaret

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = July 2002; Journal title (773t) = Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia. ISSNs: 1037-1656;

PY - 2002/7

Y1 - 2002/7

N2 - An earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Third Sector Research Conference in Dublin in 2000. In Australia, as in the rest of the industrialised world, social capital has been identified as a key element in rural regeneration. For example, the Prime Minister, John Howard, speaks openly of the need for a 'social coalition' between communities, governments and businesses that will build social cohesion and trust at community level. For two decades successive Australian governments have followed the world-wide trend in industrialised nations to devolve responsibility for social welfare programs to local areas and to nongovernment agencies, the stated rationale being to break down welfare dependency and to promote individual responsibility. The dismantling of the welfare state and the triumph of capitalism have been defining features of the Australian landscape in recent years. Meanwhile globalising trends have had significant effects on Australian rural people. Rural populations have higher rates of aging and ill health and many rural areas are experiencing increasing levels of poverty and unemployment. It would appear that there has never been a more important time to increase social capital in rural areas. However, government policies of devolution, privatisation and managerialism have been formulated with free market principles as the dominant determinant and with little apparent consideration of the effects on social capital. Services are being withdrawn in many rural areas and in others, NGOs report being overloaded and underfunded. There is widespread acceptance of the view that Australian rural people are becoming more socially isolated and alienated. This paper will examine social capital in Australian rural areas drawing on a case study conducted in a small country town in 2001.It will look at the need to match rhetoric with action and will discuss social policy initiatives that have impacted on the development of social capital.

AB - An earlier version of this paper was presented at the International Third Sector Research Conference in Dublin in 2000. In Australia, as in the rest of the industrialised world, social capital has been identified as a key element in rural regeneration. For example, the Prime Minister, John Howard, speaks openly of the need for a 'social coalition' between communities, governments and businesses that will build social cohesion and trust at community level. For two decades successive Australian governments have followed the world-wide trend in industrialised nations to devolve responsibility for social welfare programs to local areas and to nongovernment agencies, the stated rationale being to break down welfare dependency and to promote individual responsibility. The dismantling of the welfare state and the triumph of capitalism have been defining features of the Australian landscape in recent years. Meanwhile globalising trends have had significant effects on Australian rural people. Rural populations have higher rates of aging and ill health and many rural areas are experiencing increasing levels of poverty and unemployment. It would appear that there has never been a more important time to increase social capital in rural areas. However, government policies of devolution, privatisation and managerialism have been formulated with free market principles as the dominant determinant and with little apparent consideration of the effects on social capital. Services are being withdrawn in many rural areas and in others, NGOs report being overloaded and underfunded. There is widespread acceptance of the view that Australian rural people are becoming more socially isolated and alienated. This paper will examine social capital in Australian rural areas drawing on a case study conducted in a small country town in 2001.It will look at the need to match rhetoric with action and will discuss social policy initiatives that have impacted on the development of social capital.

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 93

EP - 104

JO - Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia

JF - Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia

SN - 1037-1656

IS - 2

ER -

Alston M. Social capital in rural Australia. Rural Society. 2002 Jul;12(2):93-104.