Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)
2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Inspired by Smith, Ben-Moshe suggests that we should only accommodate conscientious objections (COs) in medicine based on moral beliefs that are true, or which closely approximate to the truth. He suggests that we can identify moral truths by consulting our consciences when our consciences adopt the standpoint of an impartial spectator. He also suggests some (surprisingly modest) changes to our current practices in regard to the management of CO in medicine that would be needed were his proposal to be adopted. Here, I argue that both Smith and Ben-Moshe underestimate the difficulties involved in adopting the standpoint of an impartial spectator. In particular, both authors fail to recognise the extent to which cognitive bias and ideological commitments prevent many of us from identifying the standpoint of an impartial spectator and also prevent us from realising that we are failing to be impartial. I also consider some different changes to current practices that would be needed if we were to take on Ben-Moshe's approach to CO in medicine while also recognising the difficulties involved in adopting the standpoint of an impartial spectator.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)679-680
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume45
Issue number10
Early online date31 Aug 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this