Sonographic detection of the normal appendix: does the combination of real-time spatial compounding and tissue harmonic imaging make a difference?

Ted (Donald) Scott, Hans Swan, Eric Jurriaans, M Voss

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The purpose of this study was to determine if the application of tissue harmonic imaging (THI) and real-time spatial compounding (RTSC) would result in a significant difference in the rate of detection and quality of visualization of the normal appendix. Subjects were scanned using the experimental method (the combination of THI and RTSC) and the conventional method (without THI and RTSC). The rate of detection was 85% with the experimental method and 66% with the conventional method. The quality of visualization was measured across three scales'visualized length, walls, and lumen'with a total score equal to the sum of the three scales. The experimental method demonstrated a significant difference in visualized length and total score. The mean score for length using the conventional method was 2.18 compared with 2.56 for the experimental method. The mean score for all three scales for the conventional method was 7.97 compared with 8.67 for the experimental method.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)326-335
    Number of pages10
    JournalJournal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography
    Volume20
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Sonographic detection of the normal appendix: does the combination of real-time spatial compounding and tissue harmonic imaging make a difference?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this