TY - JOUR
T1 - South African radiographers’ radiation protection practices, a qualitative study
AU - Lewis, S.
AU - Downing, C.
AU - Hayre, C. M.
N1 - Funding Information:
No funding was received for this study
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - IntroductionRadiation
protection is multifarious, and consequently, a radiographers'
application of radiation protection is multifaceted. Studies have shown
varying radiation protection practices among radiographers. The first quantitative phase of this explanatory, sequential mixed-method study used the theory of planned behaviour
to explore South African radiographers' radiation protection behaviour.
Overall, South African radiographers' attitudes to radiation
protection, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, and
radiation protection intention was high. This second phase of the study
aimed to explore the reasons for South African radiographers' radiation
protection practices.MethodsThis
study used an exploratory and descriptive qualitative approach. Data
was collected through 13 in-depth semi-structured telephone interviews.
Thematic analysis was used in order to uncover original phenomena. Data
saturation was achieved and the study adhered to trustworthiness and
ethical measures.ResultsThematic
analysis identified two themes. The participants had the appropriate
radiation protection knowledge, but radiation protection compliance
remained a personal choice. Impediments such as feeling rushed during
imaging of trauma and challenging patients, patients knowledge of
radiation protection, resources, imaging referrals, inadequate training
when transitioning from analogue to digital radiography
and managerial support contributed to radiation protection compliance.
Strategies such as further education, research and a change in mindset
were suggested to further foster radiation protection compliance.ConclusionEven
though participants' knowledge of radiation protection aligned with the
legislated guidelines, limited internalising of the knowledge resulted
in compliance being a personal choice. Participants reflected on their
insouciant attitude and observed a similar attitude in their
radiographer colleagues. Patient and work-related impediments were
identified to contribute to radiation protection compliance. Strategies
to further foster compliance were suggested.
AB - IntroductionRadiation
protection is multifarious, and consequently, a radiographers'
application of radiation protection is multifaceted. Studies have shown
varying radiation protection practices among radiographers. The first quantitative phase of this explanatory, sequential mixed-method study used the theory of planned behaviour
to explore South African radiographers' radiation protection behaviour.
Overall, South African radiographers' attitudes to radiation
protection, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, and
radiation protection intention was high. This second phase of the study
aimed to explore the reasons for South African radiographers' radiation
protection practices.MethodsThis
study used an exploratory and descriptive qualitative approach. Data
was collected through 13 in-depth semi-structured telephone interviews.
Thematic analysis was used in order to uncover original phenomena. Data
saturation was achieved and the study adhered to trustworthiness and
ethical measures.ResultsThematic
analysis identified two themes. The participants had the appropriate
radiation protection knowledge, but radiation protection compliance
remained a personal choice. Impediments such as feeling rushed during
imaging of trauma and challenging patients, patients knowledge of
radiation protection, resources, imaging referrals, inadequate training
when transitioning from analogue to digital radiography
and managerial support contributed to radiation protection compliance.
Strategies such as further education, research and a change in mindset
were suggested to further foster radiation protection compliance.ConclusionEven
though participants' knowledge of radiation protection aligned with the
legislated guidelines, limited internalising of the knowledge resulted
in compliance being a personal choice. Participants reflected on their
insouciant attitude and observed a similar attitude in their
radiographer colleagues. Patient and work-related impediments were
identified to contribute to radiation protection compliance. Strategies
to further foster compliance were suggested.
KW - Diagnostic radiographers
KW - Qualitative study
KW - Radiation protection
KW - Radiographic practice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122198578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122198578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.radi.2021.12.008
DO - 10.1016/j.radi.2021.12.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 34991938
AN - SCOPUS:85122198578
VL - 28
SP - 387
EP - 393
JO - Radiography
JF - Radiography
SN - 1078-8174
ER -