Special measures in child sexual abuse trials: Criminal justice practitioners’ experiences and views

Eunro Lee, Jane Goodman-Delahunty, Megan Fraser, Martine B Powell, Nina J. Westera

Research output: Contribution to journalSpecial issuepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Special measures have been implemented across the globe to improve evidence procedures in child sexual assault trials. The present study explored the day-to-day experiences and views on their use by five groups of Australian criminal justice practitioners (N = 335): judges, prosecutors, defence lawyers, police officers and witness assistance officers. Most practitioners reported routine use of pre-recorded police interviews and CCTV cross-examination of child complainants, but rare use with vulnerable adults. Despite persistent technical difficulties and lengthy waiting times for witnesses, high consensus emerged that special measures enhanced trial fairness and jury understanding. The perceived impact of special measures on conviction rates diverged widely. Defence lawyers disputed that this evidence was as reliable as in-person testimony. All practitioner groups endorsed expanded use of expert witness evidence and witness intermediaries. Ongoing professional development in all practitioner groups will further enhance justice outcomes for victims of child sexual abuse.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-27
Number of pages27
JournalQUT Law Review
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Special measures in child sexual abuse trials: Criminal justice practitioners’ experiences and views'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this