TY - JOUR
T1 - Specialist care visits outside the hospital by South Australian older adults
AU - Asante, Dennis
AU - Agyemang-Duah, Williams
AU - Worley, Paul
AU - Essilfie, Gloria
AU - Isaac, Vivian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Background: Limited access to specialist medical services is a major barrier to healthcare in rural areas. We compared rural-urban specialist doctor consultations outside hospital by older adults (≥ 60 years) across South Australia. Methods: Cross-sectional data were available from the South Australia’s Department of Health. The Modified Monash Model (MM1-7) of remoteness was used to categorize data into rural (MM 3–4), remote (MM5-7), and urban (MM1-MM2) of participants in urban and non-urban South Australia. The analysis was conducted on older adults (n = 20,522), self-reporting chronic physical and common mental health conditions. Results: Specialist doctor consultation in the past 4 weeks was 14.6% in our sample. In multivariable analysis, increasing age (odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2-1.4), higher education (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI: 1.3-1.9), physical health conditions [diabetes (odds ratio 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.3); cancer (odds ratio1.8, 95% CI: 1.7-2.0); heart disease (odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI: 1.6-2.1)], and common mental disorders [depression (odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.5); anxiety (odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.6)] were associated with higher specialist care use. Specialist care use among rural (odds ratio 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6–0.9), and remote (odds ratio 0.8, 95% CI: 0.7–0.9) older people was significantly lower than their urban counterparts after controlling for age, education, and chronic disease. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate a disparity in the use of out of hospital specialist medical services between urban and non-urban areas.
AB - Background: Limited access to specialist medical services is a major barrier to healthcare in rural areas. We compared rural-urban specialist doctor consultations outside hospital by older adults (≥ 60 years) across South Australia. Methods: Cross-sectional data were available from the South Australia’s Department of Health. The Modified Monash Model (MM1-7) of remoteness was used to categorize data into rural (MM 3–4), remote (MM5-7), and urban (MM1-MM2) of participants in urban and non-urban South Australia. The analysis was conducted on older adults (n = 20,522), self-reporting chronic physical and common mental health conditions. Results: Specialist doctor consultation in the past 4 weeks was 14.6% in our sample. In multivariable analysis, increasing age (odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2-1.4), higher education (odds ratio 1.5, 95% CI: 1.3-1.9), physical health conditions [diabetes (odds ratio 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.3); cancer (odds ratio1.8, 95% CI: 1.7-2.0); heart disease (odds ratio 1.9, 95% CI: 1.6-2.1)], and common mental disorders [depression (odds ratio 1.3, 95% CI: 1.1-1.5); anxiety (odds ratio 1.4, 95% CI: 1.1-1.6)] were associated with higher specialist care use. Specialist care use among rural (odds ratio 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6–0.9), and remote (odds ratio 0.8, 95% CI: 0.7–0.9) older people was significantly lower than their urban counterparts after controlling for age, education, and chronic disease. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate a disparity in the use of out of hospital specialist medical services between urban and non-urban areas.
KW - Chronic conditions
KW - Older adults
KW - Rural health services
KW - Specialist health services
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85198474270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85198474270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12913-024-11268-6
DO - 10.1186/s12913-024-11268-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 38992648
AN - SCOPUS:85198474270
SN - 1472-6963
VL - 24
JO - BMC Health Services Research
JF - BMC Health Services Research
IS - 1
M1 - 804
ER -