Straight out of Durkheim? Haidt’s Neo-Durkheimian account of religion and the cognitive science of religion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Jon Haidt, a leading figure in contemporary moral psychology, advocates a participation-centric view of religion, according to which participation in religious communal activity is significantly more important than belief in explaining religious behaviour and commitment. He describes the participation-centric view as ‘Straight out of Durkheim’. I argue that this is a misreading of Durkheim, who held that religious behaviour and commitment are the joint products of belief and participation, with neither belief nor participation being considered more important than the other. I further argue that recent evidence from the cognitive science of religion provides support for Durkheim’s balanced account of religion and counts strongly against Haidt’s participation-centric view of religion. I suggest that Haidt’s adherence to the participation-centric view of religion is better explained by his desire to accept an account of religion that is consistent with his social intuitionist moral psychology than by his desire to accept an account of religion that accords with available scientific evidence about religion.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)197-210
Number of pages14
JournalSophia
Volume59
Early online date14 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2020

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Straight out of Durkheim? Haidt’s Neo-Durkheimian account of religion and the cognitive science of religion'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this