Strategic in/visibility

Does agency make sex workers invisible?

Julie Ham, Alison Gerard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)
21 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines the links between in/visibility, agency and mobility through the narratives of 55 predominantly indoor sex workers interviewed in Melbourne, Australia, where state government regulations permit some forms of sex work under a licensing framework. This article explores the tensions around the requirement for visibility in the regulation of sex work, the utility of strategic invisibility in the lived realities of sex work, and the discursive invisiblising of sex workers' agency in anti-prostitution discourses. For the workers we interviewed, strategic invisibility was an agentic strategy that prevented stigma and protected social, economic and geographical mobility within and outside the sex industry. In Melbourne, workers' careful management of their invisibility as sex workers contrasted with the state's harm minimisation framework that insists on sex workers' visibility within healthcare and licensing systems. This article draws on empirical data to suggest that regulation through licensing can both alleviate and contribute to vulnerabilising contexts of sex work, providing useful lessons to those considering a similar system of regulation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)298-313
Number of pages16
JournalCriminology and Criminal Justice
Volume14
Issue number3
Early online date2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2014

Fingerprint

worker
regulation
prostitution
social economics
migration
narrative
industry
discourse
management

Cite this

@article{b21092158c2144dbb29705ca9bcf38c9,
title = "Strategic in/visibility: Does agency make sex workers invisible?",
abstract = "This article examines the links between in/visibility, agency and mobility through the narratives of 55 predominantly indoor sex workers interviewed in Melbourne, Australia, where state government regulations permit some forms of sex work under a licensing framework. This article explores the tensions around the requirement for visibility in the regulation of sex work, the utility of strategic invisibility in the lived realities of sex work, and the discursive invisiblising of sex workers' agency in anti-prostitution discourses. For the workers we interviewed, strategic invisibility was an agentic strategy that prevented stigma and protected social, economic and geographical mobility within and outside the sex industry. In Melbourne, workers' careful management of their invisibility as sex workers contrasted with the state's harm minimisation framework that insists on sex workers' visibility within healthcare and licensing systems. This article draws on empirical data to suggest that regulation through licensing can both alleviate and contribute to vulnerabilising contexts of sex work, providing useful lessons to those considering a similar system of regulation.",
keywords = "Agency, In/visibility, Regulation, Sex workers, Stigma",
author = "Julie Ham and Alison Gerard",
note = "Includes bibliographical references.",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1177/1748895813500154",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "298--313",
journal = "Criminology and Criminal Justice",
issn = "1748-8958",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Strategic in/visibility : Does agency make sex workers invisible? / Ham, Julie; Gerard, Alison.

In: Criminology and Criminal Justice, Vol. 14, No. 3, 07.2014, p. 298-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Strategic in/visibility

T2 - Does agency make sex workers invisible?

AU - Ham, Julie

AU - Gerard, Alison

N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

PY - 2014/7

Y1 - 2014/7

N2 - This article examines the links between in/visibility, agency and mobility through the narratives of 55 predominantly indoor sex workers interviewed in Melbourne, Australia, where state government regulations permit some forms of sex work under a licensing framework. This article explores the tensions around the requirement for visibility in the regulation of sex work, the utility of strategic invisibility in the lived realities of sex work, and the discursive invisiblising of sex workers' agency in anti-prostitution discourses. For the workers we interviewed, strategic invisibility was an agentic strategy that prevented stigma and protected social, economic and geographical mobility within and outside the sex industry. In Melbourne, workers' careful management of their invisibility as sex workers contrasted with the state's harm minimisation framework that insists on sex workers' visibility within healthcare and licensing systems. This article draws on empirical data to suggest that regulation through licensing can both alleviate and contribute to vulnerabilising contexts of sex work, providing useful lessons to those considering a similar system of regulation.

AB - This article examines the links between in/visibility, agency and mobility through the narratives of 55 predominantly indoor sex workers interviewed in Melbourne, Australia, where state government regulations permit some forms of sex work under a licensing framework. This article explores the tensions around the requirement for visibility in the regulation of sex work, the utility of strategic invisibility in the lived realities of sex work, and the discursive invisiblising of sex workers' agency in anti-prostitution discourses. For the workers we interviewed, strategic invisibility was an agentic strategy that prevented stigma and protected social, economic and geographical mobility within and outside the sex industry. In Melbourne, workers' careful management of their invisibility as sex workers contrasted with the state's harm minimisation framework that insists on sex workers' visibility within healthcare and licensing systems. This article draws on empirical data to suggest that regulation through licensing can both alleviate and contribute to vulnerabilising contexts of sex work, providing useful lessons to those considering a similar system of regulation.

KW - Agency

KW - In/visibility

KW - Regulation

KW - Sex workers

KW - Stigma

U2 - 10.1177/1748895813500154

DO - 10.1177/1748895813500154

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 298

EP - 313

JO - Criminology and Criminal Justice

JF - Criminology and Criminal Justice

SN - 1748-8958

IS - 3

ER -