TY - JOUR
T1 - Subsurface fertilization boosts crop yields and lowers greenhouse gas emissions
T2 - A global meta-analysis
AU - Bhuiyan, Mohammad Saiful Islam
AU - Rahman, Azizur
AU - Loladze, Irakli
AU - Das, Suvendu
AU - Kim, Pil Joo
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Brain Pool Program ( 2019H1D3A1A01102761 ) through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT , Republic of Korea.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/6/10
Y1 - 2023/6/10
N2 - The subsurface application (SA) of nitrogenous fertilizers is a potential solution to mitigate climate change and improve food security. However, the impacts of SA technology on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and agronomic yield are usually evaluated separately and their results are inconsistent. To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis synthesizing 40 peer-reviewed studies on the effects of SA technology on GHG and ammonia (NH
3) emissions, nitrogen uptake (NU), crop yield, and soil residual NO
3-N in rice paddies and upland cropping system. Compared to the surface application of N, SA technology significantly increased rice yields by 32 % and crop yield in upland systems by 62 %. The largest SA-induced increases in crop yield were found at low N input rates (<100 kg Nha
−1) in rice paddies and medium N input rates (100–200 kg Nha
−1) in upland systems, suggesting that soil moisture is a key factor determining the efficiency of SA technology. SA treatments increased yields by more at reduced fertilizer rates (~30 % less N), a shallow depth (<10 cm), and with urea in both cropping systems than at the full (recommended) N rate, a deeper depth (10–20 cm), and with ammonical fertilizer. SA treatments significantly increased NU in rice paddies (34 %) and upland systems (18 %), and NO
3-N (40 %) in paddyland; however, NO
3-N decreased (28 %) in upland conditions. Ammonia mitigation was greater in paddyland than in upland conditions. SA technology decreased the carbon footprint (CF) in paddyland by 29 % and upland systems by 36 %, and overall by 33 %. Compared with broadcasting, SA significantly reduced CH
4 emissions by 16 %, N
2O emissions by 30 %, and global warming potential (GWP) by 10 % in paddy cultivation. Given SA increased grain yield and NU while reducing NH
3, CF, and GWP, this practice provides dual benefits – mitigating climate change and ensuring food security.
AB - The subsurface application (SA) of nitrogenous fertilizers is a potential solution to mitigate climate change and improve food security. However, the impacts of SA technology on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and agronomic yield are usually evaluated separately and their results are inconsistent. To address this gap, we conducted a meta-analysis synthesizing 40 peer-reviewed studies on the effects of SA technology on GHG and ammonia (NH
3) emissions, nitrogen uptake (NU), crop yield, and soil residual NO
3-N in rice paddies and upland cropping system. Compared to the surface application of N, SA technology significantly increased rice yields by 32 % and crop yield in upland systems by 62 %. The largest SA-induced increases in crop yield were found at low N input rates (<100 kg Nha
−1) in rice paddies and medium N input rates (100–200 kg Nha
−1) in upland systems, suggesting that soil moisture is a key factor determining the efficiency of SA technology. SA treatments increased yields by more at reduced fertilizer rates (~30 % less N), a shallow depth (<10 cm), and with urea in both cropping systems than at the full (recommended) N rate, a deeper depth (10–20 cm), and with ammonical fertilizer. SA treatments significantly increased NU in rice paddies (34 %) and upland systems (18 %), and NO
3-N (40 %) in paddyland; however, NO
3-N decreased (28 %) in upland conditions. Ammonia mitigation was greater in paddyland than in upland conditions. SA technology decreased the carbon footprint (CF) in paddyland by 29 % and upland systems by 36 %, and overall by 33 %. Compared with broadcasting, SA significantly reduced CH
4 emissions by 16 %, N
2O emissions by 30 %, and global warming potential (GWP) by 10 % in paddy cultivation. Given SA increased grain yield and NU while reducing NH
3, CF, and GWP, this practice provides dual benefits – mitigating climate change and ensuring food security.
KW - Deep placement
KW - Yield
KW - Nutrient uptake
KW - NO3−
KW - CH4
KW - N2O
KW - GWP
KW - Carbon footprint
KW - NO
KW - CH
KW - N O
UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969723013281?via%3Dihub
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150368623&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85150368623&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162712
DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162712
M3 - Article
C2 - 36921862
SN - 0048-9697
VL - 876
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Science of the Total Environment
JF - Science of the Total Environment
M1 - 162712
ER -