Switching on or switching off? Everyday computer use as a predictor of sustained attention and cognitive reflection

Adam Vujic

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In response to concerns that modern computer usage habits are having a deleterious effect on cognitive functioning, a study was designed to investigate the relationship between three dimensions of computer usage behaviour and two cognitive abilities: sustained attention and cognitive reflection. Trait mindfulness was incorporated as a potential protective factor for decline in cognitive functioning. A sample of 155 adults was recruited anonymously via Internet sources to complete a computer usage questionnaire, the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, the Cognitive Reflection Test and the Mackworth Clock Vigilance Test. Hierarchical regression models were generated for criterion variables cognitive reflection and sustained attention, with 7 predictors entered in three steps: (a) demographics (age, gender, education); (b) computer usage behaviour (daily computing hours, daily computing sessions, mobile use percentage); and (c) trait mindfulness. Computer usage behaviour and demographics accounted for 12.4% of the variance in sustained attention, with a significant 11.6% uniquely predicted by computer usage behaviour. For cognitive reflection, 13.5% of the variance was explained by combined computer usage and demographics, with a significant 7.4% of unique variance explained by computer usage. Computing hours and computing sessions were significant individual predictors of sustained attention, whereas computing hours, mobile use percentage and gender were significant predictors of cognitive reflection. Trait mindfulness did not significantly contribute to the predictive power for either model, suggesting it is not a protective factor for sustained attention or cognitive reflection. Findings are discussed in relation to dual-process theory, the Baddeley and Hitch working memory model and contemporary social commentary.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)152-162
Number of pages11
JournalComputers in Human Behavior
Volume72
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Mindfulness
Demography
Aptitude
Mobile computing
Predictors
Short-Term Memory
Internet
Habits
Clocks
Education
Data storage equipment
Demographics
Protective Factors

Cite this

@article{7504880163164a9982e61b40c6b40eb0,
title = "Switching on or switching off? Everyday computer use as a predictor of sustained attention and cognitive reflection",
abstract = "In response to concerns that modern computer usage habits are having a deleterious effect on cognitive functioning, a study was designed to investigate the relationship between three dimensions of computer usage behaviour and two cognitive abilities: sustained attention and cognitive reflection. Trait mindfulness was incorporated as a potential protective factor for decline in cognitive functioning. A sample of 155 adults was recruited anonymously via Internet sources to complete a computer usage questionnaire, the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, the Cognitive Reflection Test and the Mackworth Clock Vigilance Test. Hierarchical regression models were generated for criterion variables cognitive reflection and sustained attention, with 7 predictors entered in three steps: (a) demographics (age, gender, education); (b) computer usage behaviour (daily computing hours, daily computing sessions, mobile use percentage); and (c) trait mindfulness. Computer usage behaviour and demographics accounted for 12.4{\%} of the variance in sustained attention, with a significant 11.6{\%} uniquely predicted by computer usage behaviour. For cognitive reflection, 13.5{\%} of the variance was explained by combined computer usage and demographics, with a significant 7.4{\%} of unique variance explained by computer usage. Computing hours and computing sessions were significant individual predictors of sustained attention, whereas computing hours, mobile use percentage and gender were significant predictors of cognitive reflection. Trait mindfulness did not significantly contribute to the predictive power for either model, suggesting it is not a protective factor for sustained attention or cognitive reflection. Findings are discussed in relation to dual-process theory, the Baddeley and Hitch working memory model and contemporary social commentary.",
keywords = "Cognitive reflection, Computer use, Dual process theory, Mindfulness, Smartphone use, Sustained attention",
author = "Adam Vujic",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "16",
doi = "10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.040",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "152--162",
journal = "Computers in Human Behavior",
issn = "0747-5632",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Switching on or switching off? Everyday computer use as a predictor of sustained attention and cognitive reflection. / Vujic, Adam.

In: Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 72, 16.02.2017, p. 152-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Switching on or switching off? Everyday computer use as a predictor of sustained attention and cognitive reflection

AU - Vujic, Adam

PY - 2017/2/16

Y1 - 2017/2/16

N2 - In response to concerns that modern computer usage habits are having a deleterious effect on cognitive functioning, a study was designed to investigate the relationship between three dimensions of computer usage behaviour and two cognitive abilities: sustained attention and cognitive reflection. Trait mindfulness was incorporated as a potential protective factor for decline in cognitive functioning. A sample of 155 adults was recruited anonymously via Internet sources to complete a computer usage questionnaire, the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, the Cognitive Reflection Test and the Mackworth Clock Vigilance Test. Hierarchical regression models were generated for criterion variables cognitive reflection and sustained attention, with 7 predictors entered in three steps: (a) demographics (age, gender, education); (b) computer usage behaviour (daily computing hours, daily computing sessions, mobile use percentage); and (c) trait mindfulness. Computer usage behaviour and demographics accounted for 12.4% of the variance in sustained attention, with a significant 11.6% uniquely predicted by computer usage behaviour. For cognitive reflection, 13.5% of the variance was explained by combined computer usage and demographics, with a significant 7.4% of unique variance explained by computer usage. Computing hours and computing sessions were significant individual predictors of sustained attention, whereas computing hours, mobile use percentage and gender were significant predictors of cognitive reflection. Trait mindfulness did not significantly contribute to the predictive power for either model, suggesting it is not a protective factor for sustained attention or cognitive reflection. Findings are discussed in relation to dual-process theory, the Baddeley and Hitch working memory model and contemporary social commentary.

AB - In response to concerns that modern computer usage habits are having a deleterious effect on cognitive functioning, a study was designed to investigate the relationship between three dimensions of computer usage behaviour and two cognitive abilities: sustained attention and cognitive reflection. Trait mindfulness was incorporated as a potential protective factor for decline in cognitive functioning. A sample of 155 adults was recruited anonymously via Internet sources to complete a computer usage questionnaire, the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, the Cognitive Reflection Test and the Mackworth Clock Vigilance Test. Hierarchical regression models were generated for criterion variables cognitive reflection and sustained attention, with 7 predictors entered in three steps: (a) demographics (age, gender, education); (b) computer usage behaviour (daily computing hours, daily computing sessions, mobile use percentage); and (c) trait mindfulness. Computer usage behaviour and demographics accounted for 12.4% of the variance in sustained attention, with a significant 11.6% uniquely predicted by computer usage behaviour. For cognitive reflection, 13.5% of the variance was explained by combined computer usage and demographics, with a significant 7.4% of unique variance explained by computer usage. Computing hours and computing sessions were significant individual predictors of sustained attention, whereas computing hours, mobile use percentage and gender were significant predictors of cognitive reflection. Trait mindfulness did not significantly contribute to the predictive power for either model, suggesting it is not a protective factor for sustained attention or cognitive reflection. Findings are discussed in relation to dual-process theory, the Baddeley and Hitch working memory model and contemporary social commentary.

KW - Cognitive reflection

KW - Computer use

KW - Dual process theory

KW - Mindfulness

KW - Smartphone use

KW - Sustained attention

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013678446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013678446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.040

DO - 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.040

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 152

EP - 162

JO - Computers in Human Behavior

JF - Computers in Human Behavior

SN - 0747-5632

ER -