The Anthropocene as rupture

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    47 Citations (Scopus)
    329 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    I argue that Earth System science - a recent paradigm shift in the earth and life sciences (Hamilton C and Grinevald J (2015) Was the Anthropocene anticipated? The Anthropocene Review 2(1): 59-72) - named the Anthropocene as the very recent rupture in Earth history arising from the impact of human activity on the Earth System as a whole. Many have mistakenly treated the new concept of the Earth System as if it were equivalent to 'the landscape', 'ecosystems' or 'the environment'. The new paradigm of Earth System science is erroneously understood as no more than a variation or development of established ecological sciences. Various attempts to invent new starting dates for the new epoch are based on these misconceptions, as are a number of arguments deployed to reject the Anthropocene altogether. In this context I consider the early Anthropocene hypothesis, three readings of the Anthropocene as instances of ecosystem change, and the notion of the 'good Anthropocene'. Using this frame I also assess the arguments of those who do not accept the idea of the new epoch. I defend the view that disciplines other than Earth System science distort the idea of the Anthropocene when they read it through their own lenses.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)93-106
    Number of pages14
    JournalThe Anthropocene Review
    Volume3
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Anthropocene as rupture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this