The architectonic governance relation in natural persons and artificial (organisational) quasi-persons: a basis for business ethics and an obstacle to eliminative materialistic reductionism?

David Ardagh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Social and organisational applications of the architectonic relation are most familiar, but the paradigm case of the relation describes a human persons’ control via mind/will of their other capacities, such as speech, sight, and movement, for the sake of their wellbeing. It is applied analogically to intra- and inter-relations of organisational entities. This teleological relation is part of the human datum and explanandum for natural/social science. An architectonic analysis of the datum presents problems for the project of reductive materialist explanation of mind/will and organisation. The reductionist must reconfigure human and organisational architectonics as working from the “bottom-up,” via brain and nervous system events, governed by physical laws alone. This implausibly entails the denial of traditional concepts of free will/choice, in favour of physicalist compatibilism. The case for dualism or “trialism” in Philosophical Anthropology, and for traditional Ethics/Business Ethics, is strengthened by applying the analysis of “architectonic” to the mind/body explanandum, drawing on organisation theory.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)478-490
Number of pages13
JournalThe Business and Management Review
Volume5
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Reductionism
Governance
Person
Business Ethics
Architectonics
Artificial
Explanandum
Organization Theory
Dualism
Mind-body
Reductionist
Physicalist
Denial
Materialist
Social Sciences
Bottom-up
Well-being
Nervous System
Compatibilism
Free Will

Cite this

@article{c7ebb64b6b7940bf907c67aa2197b21b,
title = "The architectonic governance relation in natural persons and artificial (organisational) quasi-persons: a basis for business ethics and an obstacle to eliminative materialistic reductionism?",
abstract = "Social and organisational applications of the architectonic relation are most familiar, but the paradigm case of the relation describes a human persons’ control via mind/will of their other capacities, such as speech, sight, and movement, for the sake of their wellbeing. It is applied analogically to intra- and inter-relations of organisational entities. This teleological relation is part of the human datum and explanandum for natural/social science. An architectonic analysis of the datum presents problems for the project of reductive materialist explanation of mind/will and organisation. The reductionist must reconfigure human and organisational architectonics as working from the “bottom-up,” via brain and nervous system events, governed by physical laws alone. This implausibly entails the denial of traditional concepts of free will/choice, in favour of physicalist compatibilism. The case for dualism or “trialism” in Philosophical Anthropology, and for traditional Ethics/Business Ethics, is strengthened by applying the analysis of “architectonic” to the mind/body explanandum, drawing on organisation theory.",
keywords = "Architectonic, organisational quasi-persons, materialistic reduction",
author = "David Ardagh",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = The Business and Management Review. ISSNs: 2047-0398;",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "478--490",
journal = "The Business and Management Review",
issn = "2047-0398",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The architectonic governance relation in natural persons and artificial (organisational) quasi-persons

T2 - a basis for business ethics and an obstacle to eliminative materialistic reductionism?

AU - Ardagh, David

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = The Business and Management Review. ISSNs: 2047-0398;

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Social and organisational applications of the architectonic relation are most familiar, but the paradigm case of the relation describes a human persons’ control via mind/will of their other capacities, such as speech, sight, and movement, for the sake of their wellbeing. It is applied analogically to intra- and inter-relations of organisational entities. This teleological relation is part of the human datum and explanandum for natural/social science. An architectonic analysis of the datum presents problems for the project of reductive materialist explanation of mind/will and organisation. The reductionist must reconfigure human and organisational architectonics as working from the “bottom-up,” via brain and nervous system events, governed by physical laws alone. This implausibly entails the denial of traditional concepts of free will/choice, in favour of physicalist compatibilism. The case for dualism or “trialism” in Philosophical Anthropology, and for traditional Ethics/Business Ethics, is strengthened by applying the analysis of “architectonic” to the mind/body explanandum, drawing on organisation theory.

AB - Social and organisational applications of the architectonic relation are most familiar, but the paradigm case of the relation describes a human persons’ control via mind/will of their other capacities, such as speech, sight, and movement, for the sake of their wellbeing. It is applied analogically to intra- and inter-relations of organisational entities. This teleological relation is part of the human datum and explanandum for natural/social science. An architectonic analysis of the datum presents problems for the project of reductive materialist explanation of mind/will and organisation. The reductionist must reconfigure human and organisational architectonics as working from the “bottom-up,” via brain and nervous system events, governed by physical laws alone. This implausibly entails the denial of traditional concepts of free will/choice, in favour of physicalist compatibilism. The case for dualism or “trialism” in Philosophical Anthropology, and for traditional Ethics/Business Ethics, is strengthened by applying the analysis of “architectonic” to the mind/body explanandum, drawing on organisation theory.

KW - Architectonic

KW - organisational quasi-persons

KW - materialistic reduction

UR - http://journalseek.net/cgi-bin/journalseek/journalsearch.cgi?field=issn&query=2047-0398

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 478

EP - 490

JO - The Business and Management Review

JF - The Business and Management Review

SN - 2047-0398

IS - 1

ER -