The art of misunderstanding moral bioenhancement: Two cases

Ingmar Persson, Julian Savulescu

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In our book Unfit for the Future and a number of papers, we have argued that there is a dangerous mismatch between, on the one hand, the tremendous power of scientific technology, which has created societies with millions of citizens, and, on the other hand, our moral capacities, which have been shaped by evolution for life in small, close-knit societies with primitive technology. To overcome this mismatch before it results in the downfall of human civilization, human beings stand in acute need of moral enhancement, not only by traditional means but also by biomedical means, should this turn out to be possible. After summarizing this argument, we respond to two critics, Michael Hauskeller and Robert Sparrow.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)48-57
    Number of pages10
    JournalCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
    Volume24
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015

    Fingerprint

    Art
    mismatch
    Ethnology
    Sparrows
    Technology
    Civilization
    society
    civilization
    critic
    citizen
    human being

    Cite this

    Persson, Ingmar ; Savulescu, Julian. / The art of misunderstanding moral bioenhancement : Two cases. In: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2015 ; Vol. 24, No. 1. pp. 48-57.
    @article{515999046a8d485cb1c05d31b955a546,
    title = "The art of misunderstanding moral bioenhancement: Two cases",
    abstract = "In our book Unfit for the Future and a number of papers, we have argued that there is a dangerous mismatch between, on the one hand, the tremendous power of scientific technology, which has created societies with millions of citizens, and, on the other hand, our moral capacities, which have been shaped by evolution for life in small, close-knit societies with primitive technology. To overcome this mismatch before it results in the downfall of human civilization, human beings stand in acute need of moral enhancement, not only by traditional means but also by biomedical means, should this turn out to be possible. After summarizing this argument, we respond to two critics, Michael Hauskeller and Robert Sparrow.",
    keywords = "Agency, Autonomy, Enhancement, Freedom, God Machine, John Harris, Michael Hauskeller, Moral bioenhancement, Moral enhancement, Robert Sparrow",
    author = "Ingmar Persson and Julian Savulescu",
    note = "Includes bibliographical references.",
    year = "2015",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1017/S0963180114000292",
    language = "English",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "48--57",
    journal = "Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics",
    issn = "0963-1801",
    publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    The art of misunderstanding moral bioenhancement : Two cases. / Persson, Ingmar; Savulescu, Julian.

    In: Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, Vol. 24, No. 1, 01.2015, p. 48-57.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The art of misunderstanding moral bioenhancement

    T2 - Two cases

    AU - Persson, Ingmar

    AU - Savulescu, Julian

    N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

    PY - 2015/1

    Y1 - 2015/1

    N2 - In our book Unfit for the Future and a number of papers, we have argued that there is a dangerous mismatch between, on the one hand, the tremendous power of scientific technology, which has created societies with millions of citizens, and, on the other hand, our moral capacities, which have been shaped by evolution for life in small, close-knit societies with primitive technology. To overcome this mismatch before it results in the downfall of human civilization, human beings stand in acute need of moral enhancement, not only by traditional means but also by biomedical means, should this turn out to be possible. After summarizing this argument, we respond to two critics, Michael Hauskeller and Robert Sparrow.

    AB - In our book Unfit for the Future and a number of papers, we have argued that there is a dangerous mismatch between, on the one hand, the tremendous power of scientific technology, which has created societies with millions of citizens, and, on the other hand, our moral capacities, which have been shaped by evolution for life in small, close-knit societies with primitive technology. To overcome this mismatch before it results in the downfall of human civilization, human beings stand in acute need of moral enhancement, not only by traditional means but also by biomedical means, should this turn out to be possible. After summarizing this argument, we respond to two critics, Michael Hauskeller and Robert Sparrow.

    KW - Agency

    KW - Autonomy

    KW - Enhancement

    KW - Freedom

    KW - God Machine

    KW - John Harris

    KW - Michael Hauskeller

    KW - Moral bioenhancement

    KW - Moral enhancement

    KW - Robert Sparrow

    U2 - 10.1017/S0963180114000292

    DO - 10.1017/S0963180114000292

    M3 - Article

    C2 - 25473857

    VL - 24

    SP - 48

    EP - 57

    JO - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

    JF - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics

    SN - 0963-1801

    IS - 1

    ER -