The assessment of language and communication in Dementia

A synthesis of evidence

Luisa Krein, Yun Hee Jeon, Amanda Miller Amberber, Judith Fethney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Without the current option of a dementia cure, there is an existing need to focus on rehabilitation intervention. This includes interventions that address language and communication impairment (LCI), found to be present early in most types of dementia. Assessment of LCI can occur in many contexts (e.g., speech pathology, neuropsychology, occupational therapy) and is a vital initial step in providing adequate support to people living with dementia and their families. However, no previous research has compared the psychometric properties and utility of currently available and suitable tools for this purpose. Methods: Eighteen tools with the potential to assess language and communication in dementia were identified through a two-stage process, and a synthesis of evidence is provided. Results: Three tools satisfied all selection criteria: the Arizona Battery for Communication Disorders of Dementia, the Sydney Language Battery, and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III. Main limitations of the 18 tools reviewed concern a lack of standardization, normative data, and criterion validity, as well as poor evidence of reliability of tools originally developed for non-neurodegenerative LCI (e.g., aphasia in the context of cerebrovascular accidents). Furthermore, no tool considers the perspectives of people with dementia regarding the impact of LCI on their daily lives. Conclusion: Further research is needed to improve reliability and validity of currently available tools for the linguistic assessment of people living with dementia. Importantly, a tool to assess early identification of language and communication difficulties and associated needs among people with dementia is warranted to facilitate timely management and support.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)363-377
Number of pages16
JournalAmerican Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Volume27
Issue number4
Early online date29 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Dementia
Language
Communication
Speech-Language Pathology
Communication Disorders
Neuropsychology
Occupational Therapy
Aphasia
Linguistics
Research
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Patient Selection
Rehabilitation
Stroke

Cite this

@article{6a754cf8299a45be93a971d56c4db1c5,
title = "The assessment of language and communication in Dementia: A synthesis of evidence",
abstract = "Objective: Without the current option of a dementia cure, there is an existing need to focus on rehabilitation intervention. This includes interventions that address language and communication impairment (LCI), found to be present early in most types of dementia. Assessment of LCI can occur in many contexts (e.g., speech pathology, neuropsychology, occupational therapy) and is a vital initial step in providing adequate support to people living with dementia and their families. However, no previous research has compared the psychometric properties and utility of currently available and suitable tools for this purpose. Methods: Eighteen tools with the potential to assess language and communication in dementia were identified through a two-stage process, and a synthesis of evidence is provided. Results: Three tools satisfied all selection criteria: the Arizona Battery for Communication Disorders of Dementia, the Sydney Language Battery, and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III. Main limitations of the 18 tools reviewed concern a lack of standardization, normative data, and criterion validity, as well as poor evidence of reliability of tools originally developed for non-neurodegenerative LCI (e.g., aphasia in the context of cerebrovascular accidents). Furthermore, no tool considers the perspectives of people with dementia regarding the impact of LCI on their daily lives. Conclusion: Further research is needed to improve reliability and validity of currently available tools for the linguistic assessment of people living with dementia. Importantly, a tool to assess early identification of language and communication difficulties and associated needs among people with dementia is warranted to facilitate timely management and support.",
keywords = "assessment, communication, dementia, language, review",
author = "Luisa Krein and Jeon, {Yun Hee} and Amberber, {Amanda Miller} and Judith Fethney",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jagp.2018.11.009",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "363--377",
journal = "American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "1064-7481",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

The assessment of language and communication in Dementia : A synthesis of evidence. / Krein, Luisa; Jeon, Yun Hee; Amberber, Amanda Miller; Fethney, Judith.

In: American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 27, No. 4, 04.2019, p. 363-377.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The assessment of language and communication in Dementia

T2 - A synthesis of evidence

AU - Krein, Luisa

AU - Jeon, Yun Hee

AU - Amberber, Amanda Miller

AU - Fethney, Judith

PY - 2019/4

Y1 - 2019/4

N2 - Objective: Without the current option of a dementia cure, there is an existing need to focus on rehabilitation intervention. This includes interventions that address language and communication impairment (LCI), found to be present early in most types of dementia. Assessment of LCI can occur in many contexts (e.g., speech pathology, neuropsychology, occupational therapy) and is a vital initial step in providing adequate support to people living with dementia and their families. However, no previous research has compared the psychometric properties and utility of currently available and suitable tools for this purpose. Methods: Eighteen tools with the potential to assess language and communication in dementia were identified through a two-stage process, and a synthesis of evidence is provided. Results: Three tools satisfied all selection criteria: the Arizona Battery for Communication Disorders of Dementia, the Sydney Language Battery, and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III. Main limitations of the 18 tools reviewed concern a lack of standardization, normative data, and criterion validity, as well as poor evidence of reliability of tools originally developed for non-neurodegenerative LCI (e.g., aphasia in the context of cerebrovascular accidents). Furthermore, no tool considers the perspectives of people with dementia regarding the impact of LCI on their daily lives. Conclusion: Further research is needed to improve reliability and validity of currently available tools for the linguistic assessment of people living with dementia. Importantly, a tool to assess early identification of language and communication difficulties and associated needs among people with dementia is warranted to facilitate timely management and support.

AB - Objective: Without the current option of a dementia cure, there is an existing need to focus on rehabilitation intervention. This includes interventions that address language and communication impairment (LCI), found to be present early in most types of dementia. Assessment of LCI can occur in many contexts (e.g., speech pathology, neuropsychology, occupational therapy) and is a vital initial step in providing adequate support to people living with dementia and their families. However, no previous research has compared the psychometric properties and utility of currently available and suitable tools for this purpose. Methods: Eighteen tools with the potential to assess language and communication in dementia were identified through a two-stage process, and a synthesis of evidence is provided. Results: Three tools satisfied all selection criteria: the Arizona Battery for Communication Disorders of Dementia, the Sydney Language Battery, and the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III. Main limitations of the 18 tools reviewed concern a lack of standardization, normative data, and criterion validity, as well as poor evidence of reliability of tools originally developed for non-neurodegenerative LCI (e.g., aphasia in the context of cerebrovascular accidents). Furthermore, no tool considers the perspectives of people with dementia regarding the impact of LCI on their daily lives. Conclusion: Further research is needed to improve reliability and validity of currently available tools for the linguistic assessment of people living with dementia. Importantly, a tool to assess early identification of language and communication difficulties and associated needs among people with dementia is warranted to facilitate timely management and support.

KW - assessment

KW - communication

KW - dementia

KW - language

KW - review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058716986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058716986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.11.009

DO - 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.11.009

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 363

EP - 377

JO - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 1064-7481

IS - 4

ER -