The Difference Between Semiotics and Semiology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

What is the relationship between semiotics and semiology? Received wisdom tells us that the "semiotics" of Charles Sanders Peirce largely overlaps in function and meaning with the "semiology" of Ferdinand de Saussure. Among semioticians more attentive to the nuances of reach system, such as Sebeok, Deely, and Eco, semiology occupies that part of semiotics which relates either to conventional communication, or intentional communication, or some other subset of semiotic acts. In this essay I aim to demonstrate quite a different relation between the two fields of study. Drawing upon close readers of Saussure such as Harris and Weber, I will contrast semiotics as an act of "representation" with semiology as an act of "articulation." What I will propose is that semiotics and semiology form wholly separate but contiguous domains of explanation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-50
Number of pages14
JournalGramma Journal of Theory and Criticism
Volume20
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Semiology
Ferdinand De Saussure
Intentional Communication
Charles Sanders Peirce
Conventional
Reader
Communication
Articulation
Overlap
Wisdom
Semioticians

Cite this

@article{bbdcc7df2619429c828049172db622cb,
title = "The Difference Between Semiotics and Semiology",
abstract = "What is the relationship between semiotics and semiology? Received wisdom tells us that the {"}semiotics{"} of Charles Sanders Peirce largely overlaps in function and meaning with the {"}semiology{"} of Ferdinand de Saussure. Among semioticians more attentive to the nuances of reach system, such as Sebeok, Deely, and Eco, semiology occupies that part of semiotics which relates either to conventional communication, or intentional communication, or some other subset of semiotic acts. In this essay I aim to demonstrate quite a different relation between the two fields of study. Drawing upon close readers of Saussure such as Harris and Weber, I will contrast semiotics as an act of {"}representation{"} with semiology as an act of {"}articulation.{"} What I will propose is that semiotics and semiology form wholly separate but contiguous domains of explanation.",
keywords = "Saussure, SemioticsSemiology",
author = "Russell Daylight",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Gramma Journal of Theory and Criticism. ISSNs: 1106-1170;",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "37--50",
journal = "Gramma Journal of Theory and Criticism",
issn = "1106-1170",

}

The Difference Between Semiotics and Semiology. / Daylight, Russell.

In: Gramma Journal of Theory and Criticism, Vol. 20, 2014, p. 37-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Difference Between Semiotics and Semiology

AU - Daylight, Russell

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Gramma Journal of Theory and Criticism. ISSNs: 1106-1170;

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - What is the relationship between semiotics and semiology? Received wisdom tells us that the "semiotics" of Charles Sanders Peirce largely overlaps in function and meaning with the "semiology" of Ferdinand de Saussure. Among semioticians more attentive to the nuances of reach system, such as Sebeok, Deely, and Eco, semiology occupies that part of semiotics which relates either to conventional communication, or intentional communication, or some other subset of semiotic acts. In this essay I aim to demonstrate quite a different relation between the two fields of study. Drawing upon close readers of Saussure such as Harris and Weber, I will contrast semiotics as an act of "representation" with semiology as an act of "articulation." What I will propose is that semiotics and semiology form wholly separate but contiguous domains of explanation.

AB - What is the relationship between semiotics and semiology? Received wisdom tells us that the "semiotics" of Charles Sanders Peirce largely overlaps in function and meaning with the "semiology" of Ferdinand de Saussure. Among semioticians more attentive to the nuances of reach system, such as Sebeok, Deely, and Eco, semiology occupies that part of semiotics which relates either to conventional communication, or intentional communication, or some other subset of semiotic acts. In this essay I aim to demonstrate quite a different relation between the two fields of study. Drawing upon close readers of Saussure such as Harris and Weber, I will contrast semiotics as an act of "representation" with semiology as an act of "articulation." What I will propose is that semiotics and semiology form wholly separate but contiguous domains of explanation.

KW - Saussure

KW - SemioticsSemiology

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 37

EP - 50

JO - Gramma Journal of Theory and Criticism

JF - Gramma Journal of Theory and Criticism

SN - 1106-1170

ER -