The effect of diversion from court: A review of the evidence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)


Diversion from court has become a popular solution to perceived weaknesses in the traditional justice system, particularly in recent years with the advent of family group conferences. But evidence for the detrimental effect of court is weak. Previous research into this question shows a number of deficiencies. In particular, the range of controls used to isolate treatment from selection effects are, in most cases, inadequate for this purpose, and the measurement of the dependent variable (recidivism) is typically insensitive. There is also a failure to test for subjective reactions to either court or diversion. Because the theoretical justification for diversion is derived from labelling theory, which predicts that psychological reactions to court such as feelings of stigmatization will influence future behaviour, this is a major deficiency in the literature.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-339
Number of pages23
JournalPsychiatry, Psychology and Law
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2008


Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of diversion from court: A review of the evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this