The ethics of human enhancement

Alberto Giubilini, Sagar Sanyal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)
2129 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Ethical debate surrounding human enhancement, especially by biotechnological means, has burgeoned since the turn of the century. Issues discussed include whether specific types of enhancement are permissible or even obligatory, whether they are likely to produce a net good for individuals and for society, and whether there is something intrinsically wrong in playing God with human nature. We characterize the main camps on the issue, identifying three main positions: permissive, restrictive and conservative positions. We present the major sub-debates and lines of argument from each camp. The review also gives a flavor of the general approach of key writers in the literature such as Julian Savulescu, Nick Bostrom, Michael Sandel, and Leon Kass.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-243
Number of pages11
JournalPhilosophy Compass
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The ethics of human enhancement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this