The ethics of human enhancement

Alberto Giubilini, Sagar Sanyal

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    18 Citations (Scopus)
    2000 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Ethical debate surrounding human enhancement, especially by biotechnological means, has burgeoned since the turn of the century. Issues discussed include whether specific types of enhancement are permissible or even obligatory, whether they are likely to produce a net good for individuals and for society, and whether there is something intrinsically wrong in playing God with human nature. We characterize the main camps on the issue, identifying three main positions: permissive, restrictive and conservative positions. We present the major sub-debates and lines of argument from each camp. The review also gives a flavor of the general approach of key writers in the literature such as Julian Savulescu, Nick Bostrom, Michael Sandel, and Leon Kass.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)233-243
    Number of pages11
    JournalPhilosophy Compass
    Volume10
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The ethics of human enhancement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this