The Generalist-Particularist Distinction Does Not Need to be Replaced, it Needs to be Revised: A Response to Boudry and Napolitano

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	23-29
Number of pages	7
Journal	Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective
Publication status	Published - 2024

Access to Document

https://social-epistemology.com/2024/11/11/the-generalist-particularist-distinction-does-not-need-to-be-replaced-it-needs-to-be-revised-a-response-to-boudry-and-napolitano-steve-clarke/

Cite this

Clarke, S. (2024). The Generalist-Particularist Distinction Does Not Need to be Replaced, it Needs to be Revised: A Response to Boudry and Napolitano. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 23-29. https://social-epistemology.com/2024/11/11/the-generalist-particularist-distinction-does-not-need-to-be-replaced-it-needs-to-be-revised-a-response-to-boudry-and-napolitano-steve-clarke/

@article{fc7ffb33de3f41dba6254786b58a7b56,

title = "The Generalist-Particularist Distinction Does Not Need to be Replaced, it Needs to be Revised: A Response to Boudry and Napolitano",

author = "Stephen Clarke",

year = "2024",

language = "English",

pages = "23--29",

journal = "Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective",

issn = "2471-9560",

}

Clarke, S 2024, 'The Generalist-Particularist Distinction Does Not Need to be Replaced, it Needs to be Revised: A Response to Boudry and Napolitano', Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, pp. 23-29. <https://social-epistemology.com/2024/11/11/the-generalist-particularist-distinction-does-not-need-to-be-replaced-it-needs-to-be-revised-a-response-to-boudry-and-napolitano-steve-clarke/>