The hare and the snail: dissociating visual orienting from conscious perception

Anthony J. Lambert, Jay Shin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A method for investigating attentional effects of peripheral visual objects, independently of perceptual identification, is described. We report an experiment using this method which shows that visual processing of peripheral objects differs radically, depending on whether participants move attention in response to an object or consciously perceive that object. When luminance contrast was reduced, conscious perceptual discrimination of peripheral letters was massively slower and less accurate—but both low and high contrast letters elicited rapid attentional orienting effects and these rapid orienting effects were equal in magnitude across low and high contrast. This pattern is consistent with known differences in luminance sensitivity between the dorsal and ventral visual processing streams, and with rapid dorsal–ventral interaction mediated via re-entrant feedback. Our findings show that the control system responsible for rapid movements of attention is exquisitely sensitive to visual form information at low levels of contrast, and involves a different neurocognitive pathway to that which gives rise to conscious perception.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)829-838
JournalVisual Cognition
Volume18
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Hares
Snails
Conscious
Discrimination (Psychology)
Visual Processing
Letters

Cite this

@article{b29a48eb4d8349789c72b7d5defbf3e3,
title = "The hare and the snail: dissociating visual orienting from conscious perception",
abstract = "A method for investigating attentional effects of peripheral visual objects, independently of perceptual identification, is described. We report an experiment using this method which shows that visual processing of peripheral objects differs radically, depending on whether participants move attention in response to an object or consciously perceive that object. When luminance contrast was reduced, conscious perceptual discrimination of peripheral letters was massively slower and less accurate—but both low and high contrast letters elicited rapid attentional orienting effects and these rapid orienting effects were equal in magnitude across low and high contrast. This pattern is consistent with known differences in luminance sensitivity between the dorsal and ventral visual processing streams, and with rapid dorsal–ventral interaction mediated via re-entrant feedback. Our findings show that the control system responsible for rapid movements of attention is exquisitely sensitive to visual form information at low levels of contrast, and involves a different neurocognitive pathway to that which gives rise to conscious perception.",
author = "Lambert, {Anthony J.} and Jay Shin",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "829--838",
journal = "Visual Cognition",
issn = "1350-6285",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "6",

}

The hare and the snail: dissociating visual orienting from conscious perception. / Lambert, Anthony J.; Shin, Jay.

In: Visual Cognition, Vol. 18, No. 6, 2010, p. 829-838.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The hare and the snail: dissociating visual orienting from conscious perception

AU - Lambert, Anthony J.

AU - Shin, Jay

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - A method for investigating attentional effects of peripheral visual objects, independently of perceptual identification, is described. We report an experiment using this method which shows that visual processing of peripheral objects differs radically, depending on whether participants move attention in response to an object or consciously perceive that object. When luminance contrast was reduced, conscious perceptual discrimination of peripheral letters was massively slower and less accurate—but both low and high contrast letters elicited rapid attentional orienting effects and these rapid orienting effects were equal in magnitude across low and high contrast. This pattern is consistent with known differences in luminance sensitivity between the dorsal and ventral visual processing streams, and with rapid dorsal–ventral interaction mediated via re-entrant feedback. Our findings show that the control system responsible for rapid movements of attention is exquisitely sensitive to visual form information at low levels of contrast, and involves a different neurocognitive pathway to that which gives rise to conscious perception.

AB - A method for investigating attentional effects of peripheral visual objects, independently of perceptual identification, is described. We report an experiment using this method which shows that visual processing of peripheral objects differs radically, depending on whether participants move attention in response to an object or consciously perceive that object. When luminance contrast was reduced, conscious perceptual discrimination of peripheral letters was massively slower and less accurate—but both low and high contrast letters elicited rapid attentional orienting effects and these rapid orienting effects were equal in magnitude across low and high contrast. This pattern is consistent with known differences in luminance sensitivity between the dorsal and ventral visual processing streams, and with rapid dorsal–ventral interaction mediated via re-entrant feedback. Our findings show that the control system responsible for rapid movements of attention is exquisitely sensitive to visual form information at low levels of contrast, and involves a different neurocognitive pathway to that which gives rise to conscious perception.

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 829

EP - 838

JO - Visual Cognition

JF - Visual Cognition

SN - 1350-6285

IS - 6

ER -