The Impacts of Vertical Off‐Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study

Yazan Al‐hayek, Kelly Spuur, Rob Davidson, Christopher Hayre, Xiaoming Zheng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: This study investigates the effects of vertical off‐centring, localiser direc-tion, tube voltage, and phantom positioning (supine and prone) on computed tomography (CT) numbers and radiation dose. Methods: An anthropomorphic phantom was scanned using a Dis-covery CT750 HD—128 slice (GE Healthcare) scanner at different tube voltages (80, 120, and 140 kVp). Images employing 0° and 180° localisers were acquired in supine and prone positions for each vertical off‐centring (±100, ±60, and ±30 mm from the iso‐centre). CT numbers and displayed volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) were recorded. The relationship between dose variation and CT number was investigated. Results: The maximum changes in CT number between the two phantom positions as a function of vertical‐off‐centring were for the upper thorax 34 HU (0° localiser, 120 kVp), mid thorax 43 HU (180° localiser, 80 kVp), and for the abdominal section 31 HU (0° lo-caliser, 80 kVp) in the prone position. A strong positive correlation was reported between the variation in dose and CT number (r = 0.969, p < 0.001); 95% CI (0.93, 0.99). Conclusions: Patient positioning demands an approach with a high degree of accuracy, especially in cases where clinical decisions depend on CT number accuracy for tissue lesion characterisation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number175
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Imaging
Volume8
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jun 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Impacts of Vertical Off‐Centring, Localiser Direction, Phantom Positioning and Tube Voltage on CT Number Accuracy: An Experimental Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this