The Initial Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Pregnancy-related Anxiety scale

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

237 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This dissertation reports on the development and psychometric evaluation of the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale (PrAS). The PrAS was developed as a screening scale for the distinct anxiety type, pregnancy-related anxiety that is characterised by pregnancy-specific fears and worries. The need for the development of the PrAS was demonstrated by a critical and comprehensive review of all known scales in current use for pregnancy-related anxiety. This critical examination highlighted the lack of a suitable measure, with the majority of existing scales limited by either a lack of a theoretical foundation or evidence of validity or both.
To provide a stronger theoretical basis for this scale development, the Huizink et al. (2004) study was replicated. Huizink and colleagues demonstrated that pregnancy-related anxiety is a relatively distinct construct from general anxiety and depression. However, to date, there is little evidence of the replication of this study. The replication was completed on two separate occasions with two different samples of pregnant women. Both studies supported the findings from the original Huizink study. On the basis of this, and other similar findings that support Huizink and colleague’s conclusion, a comprehensive literature review was completed. Subsequently, the item pool was developed from this literature review and consultation with the Expert Review Panel. The Expert Review Panel, which consisted of experts in related fields (e.g. perinatal psychologists, psychometricians, and psychiatrists) assisted the assessing and refining the items. The literature review and Expert Review Panel process were both integral to establishing the scale’s content validity.
Assessment of construct validity, for the PrAS, used discriminant measures (e.g. depression and neuroticism) and convergent measures (e.g. pregnancy specific). In addition, evaluation of concurrent validity was through the examination of the scale’s predictive ability through group differentiation (i.e., anxious versus non-anxious pregnant women). Finally, examination of the PrAS’s internal validity used Rasch analysis and structural equation modelling. Rasch analysis enabled further refinement of the scale and provided more focused targeting of the population of interest (i.e. pregnant women). Further, the Rasch analysis, through the ordinal to interval score conversions, brought added precision to the scoring of the scale.
The final 32-item scale demonstrated high to excellent internal consistency reliability and good validity. The PrAS, therefore, is a screening scale that provides clinicians with a comprehensive assessment of pregnancy-related anxiety. Indeed, the PrAS contains subscales not previously seen in existing scales, which provides greater opportunity for more targeted interventions. This focused targeting is effected through individual subscale assessment after the full-scale assessment has occurred. For researchers, the PrAS also provides a comprehensive evaluation of pregnancy-related anxiety by offering greater precision in analysis by the interval scale conversions. The PrAS, therefore, makes a significant contribution to clinical and research settings in the area of pregnancy-related anxiety.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationDoctor of Philosophy
Awarding Institution
  • Charles Sturt University
Supervisors/Advisors
  • Dryer, Rachel, Principal Supervisor
  • Saliba, Anthony, Principal Supervisor
  • Kohlhoff, Jane, Principal Supervisor, External person
Award date10 Nov 2017
Publisher
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Psychometrics
Anxiety
Pregnancy
Pregnant Women
Depression
Aptitude
Reproducibility of Results
Fear
Psychiatry
Referral and Consultation

Cite this

@phdthesis{44ff5f54b0c2474698b18d792f6f4fc8,
title = "The Initial Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Pregnancy-related Anxiety scale",
abstract = "This dissertation reports on the development and psychometric evaluation of the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale (PrAS). The PrAS was developed as a screening scale for the distinct anxiety type, pregnancy-related anxiety that is characterised by pregnancy-specific fears and worries. The need for the development of the PrAS was demonstrated by a critical and comprehensive review of all known scales in current use for pregnancy-related anxiety. This critical examination highlighted the lack of a suitable measure, with the majority of existing scales limited by either a lack of a theoretical foundation or evidence of validity or both. To provide a stronger theoretical basis for this scale development, the Huizink et al. (2004) study was replicated. Huizink and colleagues demonstrated that pregnancy-related anxiety is a relatively distinct construct from general anxiety and depression. However, to date, there is little evidence of the replication of this study. The replication was completed on two separate occasions with two different samples of pregnant women. Both studies supported the findings from the original Huizink study. On the basis of this, and other similar findings that support Huizink and colleague’s conclusion, a comprehensive literature review was completed. Subsequently, the item pool was developed from this literature review and consultation with the Expert Review Panel. The Expert Review Panel, which consisted of experts in related fields (e.g. perinatal psychologists, psychometricians, and psychiatrists) assisted the assessing and refining the items. The literature review and Expert Review Panel process were both integral to establishing the scale’s content validity. Assessment of construct validity, for the PrAS, used discriminant measures (e.g. depression and neuroticism) and convergent measures (e.g. pregnancy specific). In addition, evaluation of concurrent validity was through the examination of the scale’s predictive ability through group differentiation (i.e., anxious versus non-anxious pregnant women). Finally, examination of the PrAS’s internal validity used Rasch analysis and structural equation modelling. Rasch analysis enabled further refinement of the scale and provided more focused targeting of the population of interest (i.e. pregnant women). Further, the Rasch analysis, through the ordinal to interval score conversions, brought added precision to the scoring of the scale. The final 32-item scale demonstrated high to excellent internal consistency reliability and good validity. The PrAS, therefore, is a screening scale that provides clinicians with a comprehensive assessment of pregnancy-related anxiety. Indeed, the PrAS contains subscales not previously seen in existing scales, which provides greater opportunity for more targeted interventions. This focused targeting is effected through individual subscale assessment after the full-scale assessment has occurred. For researchers, the PrAS also provides a comprehensive evaluation of pregnancy-related anxiety by offering greater precision in analysis by the interval scale conversions. The PrAS, therefore, makes a significant contribution to clinical and research settings in the area of pregnancy-related anxiety.",
keywords = "anxiety, pregnancy-related anxiety, antenatal, maternal, psychometrics",
author = "Robyn Brunton",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
publisher = "Charles Sturt University",
address = "Australia",
school = "Charles Sturt University",

}

The Initial Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Pregnancy-related Anxiety scale. / Brunton, Robyn.

Charles Sturt University, 2017. 411 p.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

TY - THES

T1 - The Initial Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Pregnancy-related Anxiety scale

AU - Brunton, Robyn

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This dissertation reports on the development and psychometric evaluation of the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale (PrAS). The PrAS was developed as a screening scale for the distinct anxiety type, pregnancy-related anxiety that is characterised by pregnancy-specific fears and worries. The need for the development of the PrAS was demonstrated by a critical and comprehensive review of all known scales in current use for pregnancy-related anxiety. This critical examination highlighted the lack of a suitable measure, with the majority of existing scales limited by either a lack of a theoretical foundation or evidence of validity or both. To provide a stronger theoretical basis for this scale development, the Huizink et al. (2004) study was replicated. Huizink and colleagues demonstrated that pregnancy-related anxiety is a relatively distinct construct from general anxiety and depression. However, to date, there is little evidence of the replication of this study. The replication was completed on two separate occasions with two different samples of pregnant women. Both studies supported the findings from the original Huizink study. On the basis of this, and other similar findings that support Huizink and colleague’s conclusion, a comprehensive literature review was completed. Subsequently, the item pool was developed from this literature review and consultation with the Expert Review Panel. The Expert Review Panel, which consisted of experts in related fields (e.g. perinatal psychologists, psychometricians, and psychiatrists) assisted the assessing and refining the items. The literature review and Expert Review Panel process were both integral to establishing the scale’s content validity. Assessment of construct validity, for the PrAS, used discriminant measures (e.g. depression and neuroticism) and convergent measures (e.g. pregnancy specific). In addition, evaluation of concurrent validity was through the examination of the scale’s predictive ability through group differentiation (i.e., anxious versus non-anxious pregnant women). Finally, examination of the PrAS’s internal validity used Rasch analysis and structural equation modelling. Rasch analysis enabled further refinement of the scale and provided more focused targeting of the population of interest (i.e. pregnant women). Further, the Rasch analysis, through the ordinal to interval score conversions, brought added precision to the scoring of the scale. The final 32-item scale demonstrated high to excellent internal consistency reliability and good validity. The PrAS, therefore, is a screening scale that provides clinicians with a comprehensive assessment of pregnancy-related anxiety. Indeed, the PrAS contains subscales not previously seen in existing scales, which provides greater opportunity for more targeted interventions. This focused targeting is effected through individual subscale assessment after the full-scale assessment has occurred. For researchers, the PrAS also provides a comprehensive evaluation of pregnancy-related anxiety by offering greater precision in analysis by the interval scale conversions. The PrAS, therefore, makes a significant contribution to clinical and research settings in the area of pregnancy-related anxiety.

AB - This dissertation reports on the development and psychometric evaluation of the Pregnancy-related Anxiety Scale (PrAS). The PrAS was developed as a screening scale for the distinct anxiety type, pregnancy-related anxiety that is characterised by pregnancy-specific fears and worries. The need for the development of the PrAS was demonstrated by a critical and comprehensive review of all known scales in current use for pregnancy-related anxiety. This critical examination highlighted the lack of a suitable measure, with the majority of existing scales limited by either a lack of a theoretical foundation or evidence of validity or both. To provide a stronger theoretical basis for this scale development, the Huizink et al. (2004) study was replicated. Huizink and colleagues demonstrated that pregnancy-related anxiety is a relatively distinct construct from general anxiety and depression. However, to date, there is little evidence of the replication of this study. The replication was completed on two separate occasions with two different samples of pregnant women. Both studies supported the findings from the original Huizink study. On the basis of this, and other similar findings that support Huizink and colleague’s conclusion, a comprehensive literature review was completed. Subsequently, the item pool was developed from this literature review and consultation with the Expert Review Panel. The Expert Review Panel, which consisted of experts in related fields (e.g. perinatal psychologists, psychometricians, and psychiatrists) assisted the assessing and refining the items. The literature review and Expert Review Panel process were both integral to establishing the scale’s content validity. Assessment of construct validity, for the PrAS, used discriminant measures (e.g. depression and neuroticism) and convergent measures (e.g. pregnancy specific). In addition, evaluation of concurrent validity was through the examination of the scale’s predictive ability through group differentiation (i.e., anxious versus non-anxious pregnant women). Finally, examination of the PrAS’s internal validity used Rasch analysis and structural equation modelling. Rasch analysis enabled further refinement of the scale and provided more focused targeting of the population of interest (i.e. pregnant women). Further, the Rasch analysis, through the ordinal to interval score conversions, brought added precision to the scoring of the scale. The final 32-item scale demonstrated high to excellent internal consistency reliability and good validity. The PrAS, therefore, is a screening scale that provides clinicians with a comprehensive assessment of pregnancy-related anxiety. Indeed, the PrAS contains subscales not previously seen in existing scales, which provides greater opportunity for more targeted interventions. This focused targeting is effected through individual subscale assessment after the full-scale assessment has occurred. For researchers, the PrAS also provides a comprehensive evaluation of pregnancy-related anxiety by offering greater precision in analysis by the interval scale conversions. The PrAS, therefore, makes a significant contribution to clinical and research settings in the area of pregnancy-related anxiety.

KW - anxiety

KW - pregnancy-related anxiety

KW - antenatal

KW - maternal

KW - psychometrics

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

PB - Charles Sturt University

ER -