The Integrity of Discourse in the Anglican Eucharistic Tradition: A Consideration of Philosophical Assumptions

Brian Douglas, Terence Lovat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article explores the integrity of the discourse in the Anglican eucharistic tradition by considering the philosophical assumptions that underlie eucharistic theology. It argues that where the conversation of the Anglican eucharistic tradition is open and unfinished then the integrity of the discourse is facilitated as opposed to the conversations of party positions and particular interests which suggest exclusive versions of truth. The conversation or dialogue of Anglican eucharistic theology is seen to be enhanced through the consideration of the philosophical assumptions of realism and nominalism to both the moderate and immoderate degrees that underpin eucharistic theology as a state of affairs. The insights of contemporary philosophers are used as a way of conceptualising the discourse of the Anglican eucharistic tradition and a model of Anglican eucharistic theology is suggested as a means of facilitating the integrity of the discourse through the recognition of multiformity in the tradition and by distancing the discourse from the hermeneutic idealism of particular interest.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)847-861
Number of pages15
JournalHeythrop Journal
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2010

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Integrity of Discourse in the Anglican Eucharistic Tradition: A Consideration of Philosophical Assumptions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this