The language citizen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Saussure famously characterizes language as both ‘mutable’ and ‘immutable.’ Any individual is free to coin a phrase or use a word in a new way, but it is only the linguistic community as a whole that can ratify the new expression, giving it social currency and legitimation. In a language, rhetorical force is constantly being applied by speakers of a language: by writers, film-makers, politicians, and academics. At the same time, resistance to linguistic innovation is being applied by the language community as a whole: in conversation, on Wikipedia, and on talkback radio. Expressions such as ‘collateral damage,’ ‘rogue state,’ or ‘queue-jumper,’ can only be given currency, force, or legitimation, by the community of speakers of a language. The Saussurean scholar Roy Harris, in his work Reading Saussure (Open Court, 1987), says that the role of the individual in making a language is remarkably similar to the role of the individual in a nation-state. This analogy naturally suggests the concept of the ‘language citizen.’ A language citizen would be a speaker of a language who makes choices in their language use, who may either ratify or resist linguistic innovation. The notion of the language citizen is a way of measuring the depth and breadth of community participation in the construction of meaning, and in the making and remaking of worlds.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-66
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Language, Literature and Culture
Volume61
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2014

Fingerprint

citizen
language
legitimation
linguistics
currency
community
Language
innovation
Wikipedia
nation state
politician
radio
damages
conversation
writer
participation

Cite this

@article{c0674061ad29419aba6bb4f3f98b22ae,
title = "The language citizen",
abstract = "Saussure famously characterizes language as both ‘mutable’ and ‘immutable.’ Any individual is free to coin a phrase or use a word in a new way, but it is only the linguistic community as a whole that can ratify the new expression, giving it social currency and legitimation. In a language, rhetorical force is constantly being applied by speakers of a language: by writers, film-makers, politicians, and academics. At the same time, resistance to linguistic innovation is being applied by the language community as a whole: in conversation, on Wikipedia, and on talkback radio. Expressions such as ‘collateral damage,’ ‘rogue state,’ or ‘queue-jumper,’ can only be given currency, force, or legitimation, by the community of speakers of a language. The Saussurean scholar Roy Harris, in his work Reading Saussure (Open Court, 1987), says that the role of the individual in making a language is remarkably similar to the role of the individual in a nation-state. This analogy naturally suggests the concept of the ‘language citizen.’ A language citizen would be a speaker of a language who makes choices in their language use, who may either ratify or resist linguistic innovation. The notion of the language citizen is a way of measuring the depth and breadth of community participation in the construction of meaning, and in the making and remaking of worlds.",
keywords = "Linguistics, Orwell, Saussure, Citizenship",
author = "Russell Daylight",
note = "Includes bibliographical references.",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1179/2051285614Z.00000000025",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "60--66",
journal = "AUMLA-Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association",
issn = "0001-2793",
publisher = "Maney Publishing",
number = "1",

}

The language citizen. / Daylight, Russell.

In: Journal of Language, Literature and Culture, Vol. 61, No. 1, 04.2014, p. 60-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The language citizen

AU - Daylight, Russell

N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

PY - 2014/4

Y1 - 2014/4

N2 - Saussure famously characterizes language as both ‘mutable’ and ‘immutable.’ Any individual is free to coin a phrase or use a word in a new way, but it is only the linguistic community as a whole that can ratify the new expression, giving it social currency and legitimation. In a language, rhetorical force is constantly being applied by speakers of a language: by writers, film-makers, politicians, and academics. At the same time, resistance to linguistic innovation is being applied by the language community as a whole: in conversation, on Wikipedia, and on talkback radio. Expressions such as ‘collateral damage,’ ‘rogue state,’ or ‘queue-jumper,’ can only be given currency, force, or legitimation, by the community of speakers of a language. The Saussurean scholar Roy Harris, in his work Reading Saussure (Open Court, 1987), says that the role of the individual in making a language is remarkably similar to the role of the individual in a nation-state. This analogy naturally suggests the concept of the ‘language citizen.’ A language citizen would be a speaker of a language who makes choices in their language use, who may either ratify or resist linguistic innovation. The notion of the language citizen is a way of measuring the depth and breadth of community participation in the construction of meaning, and in the making and remaking of worlds.

AB - Saussure famously characterizes language as both ‘mutable’ and ‘immutable.’ Any individual is free to coin a phrase or use a word in a new way, but it is only the linguistic community as a whole that can ratify the new expression, giving it social currency and legitimation. In a language, rhetorical force is constantly being applied by speakers of a language: by writers, film-makers, politicians, and academics. At the same time, resistance to linguistic innovation is being applied by the language community as a whole: in conversation, on Wikipedia, and on talkback radio. Expressions such as ‘collateral damage,’ ‘rogue state,’ or ‘queue-jumper,’ can only be given currency, force, or legitimation, by the community of speakers of a language. The Saussurean scholar Roy Harris, in his work Reading Saussure (Open Court, 1987), says that the role of the individual in making a language is remarkably similar to the role of the individual in a nation-state. This analogy naturally suggests the concept of the ‘language citizen.’ A language citizen would be a speaker of a language who makes choices in their language use, who may either ratify or resist linguistic innovation. The notion of the language citizen is a way of measuring the depth and breadth of community participation in the construction of meaning, and in the making and remaking of worlds.

KW - Linguistics

KW - Orwell

KW - Saussure

KW - Citizenship

U2 - 10.1179/2051285614Z.00000000025

DO - 10.1179/2051285614Z.00000000025

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 60

EP - 66

JO - AUMLA-Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association

JF - AUMLA-Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association

SN - 0001-2793

IS - 1

ER -