The Moral Autonomy of Human Resource Managers

Robert Macklin

    Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperConference paper

    Abstract

    Moral autonomy is a concept drawn from moral philosophy that can help build an understanding of the ethical dimension of human resource (HR) managers' roles. In this article I suggest that the concept be used to avoid simplistically viewing HR managers as either irrelevant to the ethics of human resource management (HRM) or capable of guaranteeing moral HR practices. Drawing on the findings of a qualitative study I argue that HR managers face 'relative' moral autonomy. While their capacity to ensure decency in the management of human recourses is inevitably constrained, we must not assume away the possibility that they can be important moral actors who play a role in, and have a responsibility for, determining how ethical HRM is in any organization. Moreover, this capacity should be fostered by the HR profession and academic commentators given the growing decollectivization and decentralization of employment relations in Australia.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationShifting the boundaries of employment and work. The inaugural ACREW conference
    EditorsH De Cieri, C. Costa
    Place of PublicationMelbourne
    PublisherMonash University Publishing
    Pages211-221
    Number of pages11
    Volume44
    ISBN (Electronic)0732622786
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2005
    EventThe inaugural ACREW conference - Melbourne, Australia
    Duration: 24 Jun 200525 Jun 2005

    Conference

    ConferenceThe inaugural ACREW conference
    CountryAustralia
    Period24/06/0525/06/05

    Fingerprint

    Human resources
    Autonomy
    Managers
    Human resource management
    Decentralization
    Human resource practices
    Responsibility
    Employment relations
    Moral philosophy
    Qualitative study

    Cite this

    Macklin, R. (2005). The Moral Autonomy of Human Resource Managers. In H. D. Cieri, & C. Costa (Eds.), Shifting the boundaries of employment and work. The inaugural ACREW conference (Vol. 44, pp. 211-221). Melbourne: Monash University Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411106066397
    Macklin, Robert. / The Moral Autonomy of Human Resource Managers. Shifting the boundaries of employment and work. The inaugural ACREW conference. editor / H De Cieri ; C. Costa. Vol. 44 Melbourne : Monash University Publishing, 2005. pp. 211-221
    @inproceedings{020659c3a36a47ada281a4a0781c361b,
    title = "The Moral Autonomy of Human Resource Managers",
    abstract = "Moral autonomy is a concept drawn from moral philosophy that can help build an understanding of the ethical dimension of human resource (HR) managers' roles. In this article I suggest that the concept be used to avoid simplistically viewing HR managers as either irrelevant to the ethics of human resource management (HRM) or capable of guaranteeing moral HR practices. Drawing on the findings of a qualitative study I argue that HR managers face 'relative' moral autonomy. While their capacity to ensure decency in the management of human recourses is inevitably constrained, we must not assume away the possibility that they can be important moral actors who play a role in, and have a responsibility for, determining how ethical HRM is in any organization. Moreover, this capacity should be fostered by the HR profession and academic commentators given the growing decollectivization and decentralization of employment relations in Australia.",
    author = "Robert Macklin",
    note = "Imported on 03 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Melbourne: Monash University, 2005. editor/s (773b) = De Cieri, H & Costa, C ; Event dates (773o) = 24-25 June 2005; Parent title (773t) = The inaugural ACREW conference.",
    year = "2005",
    doi = "10.1177/1038411106066397",
    language = "English",
    volume = "44",
    pages = "211--221",
    editor = "Cieri, {H De} and C. Costa",
    booktitle = "Shifting the boundaries of employment and work. The inaugural ACREW conference",
    publisher = "Monash University Publishing",
    address = "Australia",

    }

    Macklin, R 2005, The Moral Autonomy of Human Resource Managers. in HD Cieri & C Costa (eds), Shifting the boundaries of employment and work. The inaugural ACREW conference. vol. 44, Monash University Publishing, Melbourne, pp. 211-221, The inaugural ACREW conference, Australia, 24/06/05. https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411106066397

    The Moral Autonomy of Human Resource Managers. / Macklin, Robert.

    Shifting the boundaries of employment and work. The inaugural ACREW conference. ed. / H De Cieri; C. Costa. Vol. 44 Melbourne : Monash University Publishing, 2005. p. 211-221.

    Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperConference paper

    TY - GEN

    T1 - The Moral Autonomy of Human Resource Managers

    AU - Macklin, Robert

    N1 - Imported on 03 May 2017 - DigiTool details were: publisher = Melbourne: Monash University, 2005. editor/s (773b) = De Cieri, H & Costa, C ; Event dates (773o) = 24-25 June 2005; Parent title (773t) = The inaugural ACREW conference.

    PY - 2005

    Y1 - 2005

    N2 - Moral autonomy is a concept drawn from moral philosophy that can help build an understanding of the ethical dimension of human resource (HR) managers' roles. In this article I suggest that the concept be used to avoid simplistically viewing HR managers as either irrelevant to the ethics of human resource management (HRM) or capable of guaranteeing moral HR practices. Drawing on the findings of a qualitative study I argue that HR managers face 'relative' moral autonomy. While their capacity to ensure decency in the management of human recourses is inevitably constrained, we must not assume away the possibility that they can be important moral actors who play a role in, and have a responsibility for, determining how ethical HRM is in any organization. Moreover, this capacity should be fostered by the HR profession and academic commentators given the growing decollectivization and decentralization of employment relations in Australia.

    AB - Moral autonomy is a concept drawn from moral philosophy that can help build an understanding of the ethical dimension of human resource (HR) managers' roles. In this article I suggest that the concept be used to avoid simplistically viewing HR managers as either irrelevant to the ethics of human resource management (HRM) or capable of guaranteeing moral HR practices. Drawing on the findings of a qualitative study I argue that HR managers face 'relative' moral autonomy. While their capacity to ensure decency in the management of human recourses is inevitably constrained, we must not assume away the possibility that they can be important moral actors who play a role in, and have a responsibility for, determining how ethical HRM is in any organization. Moreover, this capacity should be fostered by the HR profession and academic commentators given the growing decollectivization and decentralization of employment relations in Australia.

    U2 - 10.1177/1038411106066397

    DO - 10.1177/1038411106066397

    M3 - Conference paper

    VL - 44

    SP - 211

    EP - 221

    BT - Shifting the boundaries of employment and work. The inaugural ACREW conference

    A2 - Cieri, H De

    A2 - Costa, C.

    PB - Monash University Publishing

    CY - Melbourne

    ER -

    Macklin R. The Moral Autonomy of Human Resource Managers. In Cieri HD, Costa C, editors, Shifting the boundaries of employment and work. The inaugural ACREW conference. Vol. 44. Melbourne: Monash University Publishing. 2005. p. 211-221 https://doi.org/10.1177/1038411106066397