Abstract
In this paper, I critique one aspect of Simester and von Hirsch's, Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs-their recognition of harm and offence principles, but failure to construct a paternalistic principle, despite their willingness to countenance some small measure of criminal paternalism. Construction of such a principle would have clarified the problems of as well as the limits to criminalising paternalism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 315-327 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Criminal Law and Philosophy |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 2014 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
