The political response to rural social and economic sustainability: A cross-national study of Thai and Australian rural policy, 1997-2007

Narumol Nirathron, Troy Whitford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article provides a cross-national examination of Thai and Australian political responses to rural social and economic inequity during the period 1997-2007 using an historical lens. It highlights different policy approaches and their philosophical underpinnings. Both the National Party and Thai Rak Thai Party shared similar policy positions. Village funds and rural community development programs were aimed at providing capital to encourage the establishment of new enterprises or partnerships in building infrastructure. In some respects they were compensationary for changes in global agricultural commodity trading conditions and an acknowledgement that markets fail producers in the rural sector. The contrast between Thai and Australian approaches to rural policy is in the philosophy of 'Sufficiency Economy'. A philosophy rejected by the Thai Rak Thai Party, Sufficiency Economy, was essentially building upon long held peasant traditions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-77
Number of pages11
JournalRural Society
Volume22
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

rural policy
sustainability
policy approach
community development
economics
commodity
village
infrastructure
market
economy
Cross-national study
Economic sustainability
Social sustainability
Sufficiency
policy
programme

Cite this

@article{184838373c1c42988ffde7d43f491545,
title = "The political response to rural social and economic sustainability: A cross-national study of Thai and Australian rural policy, 1997-2007",
abstract = "This article provides a cross-national examination of Thai and Australian political responses to rural social and economic inequity during the period 1997-2007 using an historical lens. It highlights different policy approaches and their philosophical underpinnings. Both the National Party and Thai Rak Thai Party shared similar policy positions. Village funds and rural community development programs were aimed at providing capital to encourage the establishment of new enterprises or partnerships in building infrastructure. In some respects they were compensationary for changes in global agricultural commodity trading conditions and an acknowledgement that markets fail producers in the rural sector. The contrast between Thai and Australian approaches to rural policy is in the philosophy of 'Sufficiency Economy'. A philosophy rejected by the Thai Rak Thai Party, Sufficiency Economy, was essentially building upon long held peasant traditions.",
keywords = "Open access version available",
author = "Narumol Nirathron and Troy Whitford",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia. ISSNs: 1037-1656;",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "67--77",
journal = "Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia",
issn = "1037-1656",
publisher = "eContent Management Pty Ltd",
number = "1",

}

The political response to rural social and economic sustainability : A cross-national study of Thai and Australian rural policy, 1997-2007. / Nirathron, Narumol; Whitford, Troy.

In: Rural Society, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2012, p. 67-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The political response to rural social and economic sustainability

T2 - A cross-national study of Thai and Australian rural policy, 1997-2007

AU - Nirathron, Narumol

AU - Whitford, Troy

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia. ISSNs: 1037-1656;

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - This article provides a cross-national examination of Thai and Australian political responses to rural social and economic inequity during the period 1997-2007 using an historical lens. It highlights different policy approaches and their philosophical underpinnings. Both the National Party and Thai Rak Thai Party shared similar policy positions. Village funds and rural community development programs were aimed at providing capital to encourage the establishment of new enterprises or partnerships in building infrastructure. In some respects they were compensationary for changes in global agricultural commodity trading conditions and an acknowledgement that markets fail producers in the rural sector. The contrast between Thai and Australian approaches to rural policy is in the philosophy of 'Sufficiency Economy'. A philosophy rejected by the Thai Rak Thai Party, Sufficiency Economy, was essentially building upon long held peasant traditions.

AB - This article provides a cross-national examination of Thai and Australian political responses to rural social and economic inequity during the period 1997-2007 using an historical lens. It highlights different policy approaches and their philosophical underpinnings. Both the National Party and Thai Rak Thai Party shared similar policy positions. Village funds and rural community development programs were aimed at providing capital to encourage the establishment of new enterprises or partnerships in building infrastructure. In some respects they were compensationary for changes in global agricultural commodity trading conditions and an acknowledgement that markets fail producers in the rural sector. The contrast between Thai and Australian approaches to rural policy is in the philosophy of 'Sufficiency Economy'. A philosophy rejected by the Thai Rak Thai Party, Sufficiency Economy, was essentially building upon long held peasant traditions.

KW - Open access version available

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 67

EP - 77

JO - Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia

JF - Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia

SN - 1037-1656

IS - 1

ER -