The semiotic abstraction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

When we press the "A" key on our computer keyboard, an "a" appears on our screen almost simultaneously. In between those two points there are a number of layers of computer program which communicate with each other: The keyboard controller sends a message to the operating system which is interpreted by a word processor, which then returns a message to the operating system, which communicates with the video controller and the video board sends a message that it needs an "a" and this is mapped as a group of pixels which light up on the screen. Except that none of this actually happens. At the level of physical reality, all that happens is the shifting of magnetic fields and the passing of electrons. The electrons orbiting atoms slide from one atom to the next along wires, among silicon and metal. Entities like computer programs and operating systems are abstractions, layers of abstractions in fact, on top of a brute reality. In this paper I argue that this is the appropriate starting point for understanding the role of semiotics in negotiating reality. Taking examples from computer science, visual perception, and language, this inquiry considers what kind of abstraction we want semiotics to be. It is found that "the semiotic abstraction" allows us to understand semiotic systems as machines for creating differences, and semiotics itself as the primordial science of meaning.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-90
Number of pages10
JournalSemiotica
Volume2017
Issue number218
Early online date16 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 26 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

abstraction
semiotics
data processing program
video
visual perception
computer science
language
science
Group
Atom
Keyboard
Layer

Cite this

Daylight, Russell. / The semiotic abstraction. In: Semiotica. 2017 ; Vol. 2017, No. 218. pp. 81-90.
@article{5be7e94a9fb44b38951971db4c3d104f,
title = "The semiotic abstraction",
abstract = "When we press the {"}A{"} key on our computer keyboard, an {"}a{"} appears on our screen almost simultaneously. In between those two points there are a number of layers of computer program which communicate with each other: The keyboard controller sends a message to the operating system which is interpreted by a word processor, which then returns a message to the operating system, which communicates with the video controller and the video board sends a message that it needs an {"}a{"} and this is mapped as a group of pixels which light up on the screen. Except that none of this actually happens. At the level of physical reality, all that happens is the shifting of magnetic fields and the passing of electrons. The electrons orbiting atoms slide from one atom to the next along wires, among silicon and metal. Entities like computer programs and operating systems are abstractions, layers of abstractions in fact, on top of a brute reality. In this paper I argue that this is the appropriate starting point for understanding the role of semiotics in negotiating reality. Taking examples from computer science, visual perception, and language, this inquiry considers what kind of abstraction we want semiotics to be. It is found that {"}the semiotic abstraction{"} allows us to understand semiotic systems as machines for creating differences, and semiotics itself as the primordial science of meaning.",
keywords = "abstraction, Saussure, semiology, semiotics, Shaumyan",
author = "Russell Daylight",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "26",
doi = "10.1515/sem-2016-0148",
language = "English",
volume = "2017",
pages = "81--90",
journal = "Semiotica: journal of the international association for semiotic studies",
issn = "0037-1998",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "218",

}

The semiotic abstraction. / Daylight, Russell.

In: Semiotica, Vol. 2017, No. 218, 26.09.2017, p. 81-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The semiotic abstraction

AU - Daylight, Russell

PY - 2017/9/26

Y1 - 2017/9/26

N2 - When we press the "A" key on our computer keyboard, an "a" appears on our screen almost simultaneously. In between those two points there are a number of layers of computer program which communicate with each other: The keyboard controller sends a message to the operating system which is interpreted by a word processor, which then returns a message to the operating system, which communicates with the video controller and the video board sends a message that it needs an "a" and this is mapped as a group of pixels which light up on the screen. Except that none of this actually happens. At the level of physical reality, all that happens is the shifting of magnetic fields and the passing of electrons. The electrons orbiting atoms slide from one atom to the next along wires, among silicon and metal. Entities like computer programs and operating systems are abstractions, layers of abstractions in fact, on top of a brute reality. In this paper I argue that this is the appropriate starting point for understanding the role of semiotics in negotiating reality. Taking examples from computer science, visual perception, and language, this inquiry considers what kind of abstraction we want semiotics to be. It is found that "the semiotic abstraction" allows us to understand semiotic systems as machines for creating differences, and semiotics itself as the primordial science of meaning.

AB - When we press the "A" key on our computer keyboard, an "a" appears on our screen almost simultaneously. In between those two points there are a number of layers of computer program which communicate with each other: The keyboard controller sends a message to the operating system which is interpreted by a word processor, which then returns a message to the operating system, which communicates with the video controller and the video board sends a message that it needs an "a" and this is mapped as a group of pixels which light up on the screen. Except that none of this actually happens. At the level of physical reality, all that happens is the shifting of magnetic fields and the passing of electrons. The electrons orbiting atoms slide from one atom to the next along wires, among silicon and metal. Entities like computer programs and operating systems are abstractions, layers of abstractions in fact, on top of a brute reality. In this paper I argue that this is the appropriate starting point for understanding the role of semiotics in negotiating reality. Taking examples from computer science, visual perception, and language, this inquiry considers what kind of abstraction we want semiotics to be. It is found that "the semiotic abstraction" allows us to understand semiotic systems as machines for creating differences, and semiotics itself as the primordial science of meaning.

KW - abstraction

KW - Saussure

KW - semiology

KW - semiotics

KW - Shaumyan

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029333483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029333483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/sem-2016-0148

DO - 10.1515/sem-2016-0148

M3 - Article

VL - 2017

SP - 81

EP - 90

JO - Semiotica: journal of the international association for semiotic studies

JF - Semiotica: journal of the international association for semiotic studies

SN - 0037-1998

IS - 218

ER -