The specific deterrent effect of custodial penalties on juvenile re-offending.

Don Weatherburn, Sumitra Vignaendra, Andrew McGrath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Downloads (Pure)


It is widely assumed that placing offenders (juvenile or adult) in custody acts as a deterrent to further offending. The present study was designed to see whether juvenile offenders who receive a detention sentence are less likely to re-offend, controlling for other factors, than juvenile offenders given some other form of sentence. Two groups of offenders (152 given an detention sentence, 243 given a non-custodial sentence) were interviewed at length about their family life, school performance, association with delinquent peers and substance abuse. They were then followed up to determine what proportion in each group was reconvicted of a further offence. Cox regression was used to model time to reconviction. The study found no significant difference between juveniles given a custodial penalty and those given a non-custodial penalty in the likelihood of reconviction, even after controlling for factors that differ between the two groups.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalCrime and Justice Bulletin
VolumeJuly 2009
Issue number132
Publication statusPublished - 2009


Dive into the research topics of 'The specific deterrent effect of custodial penalties on juvenile re-offending.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this