The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Challenges for Australian health and medicine policies

Thomas Faunce, Ruth Townsend

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)


Four formal rounds of Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement
(TPPA) negotiations took place in 2010. They involved over
200 officials from Australia, the United States, New Zealand,
Chile, Singapore, Brunei, Peru, Vietnam and Malaysia.
• Future negotiations officially are set to include three issues
with public health and medicines policy implications for
Australia and our region:
• ways to approach regulatory coherence and transparency;
• how to benefit multinational and small–medium
enterprises; and
• multilateral investor–state dispute settlement.
• US-based multinational pharmaceutical companies are
lobbying for TPPA provisions like those in the Australia–US
Free Trade Agreement, which reduce government cost-
effectiveness regulatory control of pharmaceuticals,
threatening equitable access to medicines.
• They also advocate increased TPPA intellectual monopoly
privilege protection, which will further limit the development
of Australian generic medicine enterprises and restrict patient
access to cheap, bioequivalent prescription drugs.
• Of particular concern is that proposed TPPA multilateral
investor–state dispute settlement procedures would allow
US corporations (as well as those of other TPPA nations) to
obtain damages against Australian governments through
international arbitral proceedings if their investments are
impeded by Australian public health and environment protection legislation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-86
Number of pages4
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2011


Dive into the research topics of 'The Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Challenges for Australian health and medicine policies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this