Think twice before starting a new trial; what is the impact of recommendations to stop doing new trials?

Leontien M van Ravesteyn, Ian W Skinner, Toby Newton-John, Manuela L Ferreira, Arianne P Verhagen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives In evidence-based medicine, we base our conclusions on the effectiveness of interventions on the results of high-quality meta-analysis. If a new randomized controlled trial (RCT) is unlikely to change the pooled effect estimate, conducting the new trial is a waste of resources. We evaluated whether recommendations not to conduct further RCTs reduced the number of trials registered for two scenarios. Methods Analysis of registered trials on the World Health Organisation (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We regarded trial protocols relevant if they evaluated the effectiveness of (1) exercise for chronic low back pain (LBP) and (2) cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for chronic pain. We calculated absolute and relative numbers and change of registered trials in a pre-set time window before and after publication of the recommendations, both published in 2012. Results We found 1,574 trials registered in the WHO trial registry for exercise in LBP (459 before 2012; 1,115 after) and 5,037 trials on chronic pain (1,564 before 2012; 3,473 after). Before 2012, 13 trials on exercise for LBP (out of 459) fit the selection criteria, compared to 42 trials (out of 1,115) after, which represents a relative increase of 33%. Twelve trials (out of 1,564) regarding CBT for chronic pain, fit the selection criteria before 2012 and 18 trials (out of 3,473) after, representing a relative decrease of 32%. We found that visibility, media exposure and strength of the recommendation were related to a decrease in registered trials. Conclusions Recommendations not to conduct further RCTs might reduce the number of trials registered if these recommendations are strongly worded and combined with social media attention.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)152-162
Number of pages11
JournalScandinavian Journal of Pain
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online date07 Sep 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 Jan 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Think twice before starting a new trial; what is the impact of recommendations to stop doing new trials?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this