TY - JOUR
T1 - Three Lidcombe program clinic visit options
T2 - A phase II trial
AU - Koushik, Sarita
AU - Hewat, Sally
AU - Onslow, Mark
AU - Shenker, Rosalee
AU - Jones, Mark
AU - O'Brian, Sue
AU - Packman, Ann
AU - Menzies, Ross
AU - Harrison, Elizabth
AU - Wilson, Linda
PY - 2019/11/1
Y1 - 2019/11/1
N2 - Purpose: Weekly clinic visits are recommended in the Lidcombe Program Treatment Guide (Packman et al., 2015). That specification is based on traditional speech-language pathology practices rather than empirical research, and two studies have suggested that such a format does not always occur in clinical communities. This research was conducted to determine the relative efficacy of different Lidcombe Program models of clinic visits. Method: Thirty-one children were randomized to three different service delivery models: twice-weekly, weekly and fortnightly (once every two weeks) clinic visits. All children were treated with the Lidcombe Program following manualised procedures. Measures of percentage syllables stuttered were obtained from beyond clinic audio recordings pre- and post-randomization. Results: Results showed that the twice-weekly and fortnightly treatment formats were not suitable for all families. However, the fortnightly outcomes at 9 months post-randomization were comparable with those attained during weekly clinic visits. Conclusions: These results justify further, large-scale clinical trialling to compare weekly Lidcombe Program clinic visits with schedules involving less frequent clinic visits.
AB - Purpose: Weekly clinic visits are recommended in the Lidcombe Program Treatment Guide (Packman et al., 2015). That specification is based on traditional speech-language pathology practices rather than empirical research, and two studies have suggested that such a format does not always occur in clinical communities. This research was conducted to determine the relative efficacy of different Lidcombe Program models of clinic visits. Method: Thirty-one children were randomized to three different service delivery models: twice-weekly, weekly and fortnightly (once every two weeks) clinic visits. All children were treated with the Lidcombe Program following manualised procedures. Measures of percentage syllables stuttered were obtained from beyond clinic audio recordings pre- and post-randomization. Results: Results showed that the twice-weekly and fortnightly treatment formats were not suitable for all families. However, the fortnightly outcomes at 9 months post-randomization were comparable with those attained during weekly clinic visits. Conclusions: These results justify further, large-scale clinical trialling to compare weekly Lidcombe Program clinic visits with schedules involving less frequent clinic visits.
KW - Intervention
KW - Randomized controlled trial
KW - Service delivery
KW - Stuttering
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069676140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069676140&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105919
DO - 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2019.105919
M3 - Article
C2 - 31351345
AN - SCOPUS:85069676140
SN - 0021-9924
VL - 82
SP - 1
EP - 9
JO - Journal of Communication Disorders
JF - Journal of Communication Disorders
M1 - 105919
ER -