Till Death Us Do Part? A Critical Analysis of Obligation and Choice for Spousal Caregivers

Belinda Cash, Suzanne Hodgkin, Jeni Warburton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research demonstrates a significant number of carers identify obligation or lack of other alternatives as the reasons they undertake informal care. By utilizing critical discourse analysis, this research explores choice for informal caregivers in contemporary Australian social policy. Analysis demonstrates increasing shifts in policy toward choice in consumer-directed care, a feature absent for those who provide care. Familial care is a central pillar of Australian social policy, as it is in many liberal and conservative welfare regimes. Analysis reveals that these core social policies are fundamentally incongruent, with significant implications for individuals and social work practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)657-674
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Gerontological Social Work
Volume56
Issue number8
Early online dateJul 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Public Policy
Caregivers
caregiver
obligation
death
Social Work
Research
Patient Care
discourse analysis
social work
welfare
lack
Social Policy

Cite this

@article{31ca6ce5be2d4829ae2572e481dd6196,
title = "Till Death Us Do Part? A Critical Analysis of Obligation and Choice for Spousal Caregivers",
abstract = "Research demonstrates a significant number of carers identify obligation or lack of other alternatives as the reasons they undertake informal care. By utilizing critical discourse analysis, this research explores choice for informal caregivers in contemporary Australian social policy. Analysis demonstrates increasing shifts in policy toward choice in consumer-directed care, a feature absent for those who provide care. Familial care is a central pillar of Australian social policy, as it is in many liberal and conservative welfare regimes. Analysis reveals that these core social policies are fundamentally incongruent, with significant implications for individuals and social work practice.",
keywords = "aging, caregiver, choice, critical discourse analysis, informal care, social policy, spousal care",
author = "Belinda Cash and Suzanne Hodgkin and Jeni Warburton",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/01634372.2013.823472",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "657--674",
journal = "Journal of Gerontological Social Work",
issn = "0163-4372",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "8",

}

Till Death Us Do Part? A Critical Analysis of Obligation and Choice for Spousal Caregivers. / Cash, Belinda; Hodgkin, Suzanne; Warburton, Jeni.

In: Journal of Gerontological Social Work, Vol. 56, No. 8, 09.2013, p. 657-674.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Till Death Us Do Part? A Critical Analysis of Obligation and Choice for Spousal Caregivers

AU - Cash, Belinda

AU - Hodgkin, Suzanne

AU - Warburton, Jeni

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Research demonstrates a significant number of carers identify obligation or lack of other alternatives as the reasons they undertake informal care. By utilizing critical discourse analysis, this research explores choice for informal caregivers in contemporary Australian social policy. Analysis demonstrates increasing shifts in policy toward choice in consumer-directed care, a feature absent for those who provide care. Familial care is a central pillar of Australian social policy, as it is in many liberal and conservative welfare regimes. Analysis reveals that these core social policies are fundamentally incongruent, with significant implications for individuals and social work practice.

AB - Research demonstrates a significant number of carers identify obligation or lack of other alternatives as the reasons they undertake informal care. By utilizing critical discourse analysis, this research explores choice for informal caregivers in contemporary Australian social policy. Analysis demonstrates increasing shifts in policy toward choice in consumer-directed care, a feature absent for those who provide care. Familial care is a central pillar of Australian social policy, as it is in many liberal and conservative welfare regimes. Analysis reveals that these core social policies are fundamentally incongruent, with significant implications for individuals and social work practice.

KW - aging

KW - caregiver

KW - choice

KW - critical discourse analysis

KW - informal care

KW - social policy

KW - spousal care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887193043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887193043&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01634372.2013.823472

DO - 10.1080/01634372.2013.823472

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 657

EP - 674

JO - Journal of Gerontological Social Work

JF - Journal of Gerontological Social Work

SN - 0163-4372

IS - 8

ER -