Tinbergen's "four questions" provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people

Ian D. Stephen, Darren Burke, Danielle Sulikowski

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

We adopt Tinbergen's (1963) "four questions" approach to strengthen the criticism by Maestripieri et al. of the non-evolutionary accounts of favouritism toward attractive individuals, by showing which levels of explanation are lacking in these accounts. We also use this approach to propose ways in which the evolutionary account may be extended and strengthened.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere44
Pages (from-to)38-39
Number of pages1
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume40
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

criticism
trend
Evolutionary
Criticism

Cite this

@article{e91c4c47838f4ebcae1fd56f0c94079d,
title = "Tinbergen's {"}four questions{"} provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people",
abstract = "We adopt Tinbergen's (1963) {"}four questions{"} approach to strengthen the criticism by Maestripieri et al. of the non-evolutionary accounts of favouritism toward attractive individuals, by showing which levels of explanation are lacking in these accounts. We also use this approach to propose ways in which the evolutionary account may be extended and strengthened.",
author = "Stephen, {Ian D.} and Darren Burke and Danielle Sulikowski",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1017/S0140525X16000650",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "38--39",
journal = "Behavioral and Brain Sciences",
issn = "0140-525X",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

Tinbergen's "four questions" provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people. / Stephen, Ian D.; Burke, Darren; Sulikowski, Danielle.

In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 40, e44, 2017, p. 38-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tinbergen's "four questions" provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people

AU - Stephen, Ian D.

AU - Burke, Darren

AU - Sulikowski, Danielle

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - We adopt Tinbergen's (1963) "four questions" approach to strengthen the criticism by Maestripieri et al. of the non-evolutionary accounts of favouritism toward attractive individuals, by showing which levels of explanation are lacking in these accounts. We also use this approach to propose ways in which the evolutionary account may be extended and strengthened.

AB - We adopt Tinbergen's (1963) "four questions" approach to strengthen the criticism by Maestripieri et al. of the non-evolutionary accounts of favouritism toward attractive individuals, by showing which levels of explanation are lacking in these accounts. We also use this approach to propose ways in which the evolutionary account may be extended and strengthened.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016222371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016222371&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0140525X16000650

DO - 10.1017/S0140525X16000650

M3 - Review article

VL - 40

SP - 38

EP - 39

JO - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

JF - Behavioral and Brain Sciences

SN - 0140-525X

M1 - e44

ER -