Towards a Duty of Care for Biodiversity

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The decline in biodiversity is a worldwide phenomenon, with current rates of species extinction more dramatic than any previously recorded. Habitat loss has been identified as the major cause of biodiversity decline. In this article we suggest that a statutory duty of care would complement the current mix of policy options for biodiversity conservation. Obstacles hindering the introduction of a statutory duty of care include linguistic ambiguity about the terms 'duty of care' and 'stewardship' and how they are applied in a natural resource management context, and the absence of a mechanism to guide its implementation. Drawing on international literature and key informant interviews we have articulated characteristics of duty of care to reduce linguistic ambiguity, and developed a framework for implementing a duty of care for biodiversity at the regional scale. The framework draws on key elements of the common law 'duty of care', the concepts of 'taking reasonable care' and 'avoiding foreseeable harm', in its logic. Core elements of the framework include desired outcomes for biodiversity, supported by current recommended practices. The focus on outcomes provides opportunities for the development of innovative management practices. The framework incorporates multiple pathways for the redress of non-compliance including tiered negative sanctions, and positive measures to encourage compliance. Importantly, the framework addresses the need for change and adaptation that is a necessary part of biodiversity management.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)682-696
Number of pages15
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume45
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Biodiversity
biodiversity
Linguistics
Natural resources management
sanction
habitat loss
compliance
management practice
Conservation
resource management
natural resource
extinction

Cite this

@article{639f593184f74c25878372fd7372849b,
title = "Towards a Duty of Care for Biodiversity",
abstract = "The decline in biodiversity is a worldwide phenomenon, with current rates of species extinction more dramatic than any previously recorded. Habitat loss has been identified as the major cause of biodiversity decline. In this article we suggest that a statutory duty of care would complement the current mix of policy options for biodiversity conservation. Obstacles hindering the introduction of a statutory duty of care include linguistic ambiguity about the terms 'duty of care' and 'stewardship' and how they are applied in a natural resource management context, and the absence of a mechanism to guide its implementation. Drawing on international literature and key informant interviews we have articulated characteristics of duty of care to reduce linguistic ambiguity, and developed a framework for implementing a duty of care for biodiversity at the regional scale. The framework draws on key elements of the common law 'duty of care', the concepts of 'taking reasonable care' and 'avoiding foreseeable harm', in its logic. Core elements of the framework include desired outcomes for biodiversity, supported by current recommended practices. The focus on outcomes provides opportunities for the development of innovative management practices. The framework incorporates multiple pathways for the redress of non-compliance including tiered negative sanctions, and positive measures to encourage compliance. Importantly, the framework addresses the need for change and adaptation that is a necessary part of biodiversity management.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Australia, Biodiversity, Duty of care, Stewardship",
author = "Gillian Earl and Allan Curtis and Catherine Allan",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Environmental Management (New York): an international journal for decision-makers, scientists and environmental auditors. ISSNs: 0364-152X;",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-010-9444-z",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "682--696",
journal = "Environmental Management (New York): an international journal for decision-makers, scientists and environmental auditors",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "4",

}

Towards a Duty of Care for Biodiversity. / Earl, Gillian; Curtis, Allan; Allan, Catherine.

In: Environmental Management, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2010, p. 682-696.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a Duty of Care for Biodiversity

AU - Earl, Gillian

AU - Curtis, Allan

AU - Allan, Catherine

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Environmental Management (New York): an international journal for decision-makers, scientists and environmental auditors. ISSNs: 0364-152X;

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The decline in biodiversity is a worldwide phenomenon, with current rates of species extinction more dramatic than any previously recorded. Habitat loss has been identified as the major cause of biodiversity decline. In this article we suggest that a statutory duty of care would complement the current mix of policy options for biodiversity conservation. Obstacles hindering the introduction of a statutory duty of care include linguistic ambiguity about the terms 'duty of care' and 'stewardship' and how they are applied in a natural resource management context, and the absence of a mechanism to guide its implementation. Drawing on international literature and key informant interviews we have articulated characteristics of duty of care to reduce linguistic ambiguity, and developed a framework for implementing a duty of care for biodiversity at the regional scale. The framework draws on key elements of the common law 'duty of care', the concepts of 'taking reasonable care' and 'avoiding foreseeable harm', in its logic. Core elements of the framework include desired outcomes for biodiversity, supported by current recommended practices. The focus on outcomes provides opportunities for the development of innovative management practices. The framework incorporates multiple pathways for the redress of non-compliance including tiered negative sanctions, and positive measures to encourage compliance. Importantly, the framework addresses the need for change and adaptation that is a necessary part of biodiversity management.

AB - The decline in biodiversity is a worldwide phenomenon, with current rates of species extinction more dramatic than any previously recorded. Habitat loss has been identified as the major cause of biodiversity decline. In this article we suggest that a statutory duty of care would complement the current mix of policy options for biodiversity conservation. Obstacles hindering the introduction of a statutory duty of care include linguistic ambiguity about the terms 'duty of care' and 'stewardship' and how they are applied in a natural resource management context, and the absence of a mechanism to guide its implementation. Drawing on international literature and key informant interviews we have articulated characteristics of duty of care to reduce linguistic ambiguity, and developed a framework for implementing a duty of care for biodiversity at the regional scale. The framework draws on key elements of the common law 'duty of care', the concepts of 'taking reasonable care' and 'avoiding foreseeable harm', in its logic. Core elements of the framework include desired outcomes for biodiversity, supported by current recommended practices. The focus on outcomes provides opportunities for the development of innovative management practices. The framework incorporates multiple pathways for the redress of non-compliance including tiered negative sanctions, and positive measures to encourage compliance. Importantly, the framework addresses the need for change and adaptation that is a necessary part of biodiversity management.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Australia

KW - Biodiversity

KW - Duty of care

KW - Stewardship

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-010-9444-z

DO - 10.1007/s00267-010-9444-z

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 682

EP - 696

JO - Environmental Management (New York): an international journal for decision-makers, scientists and environmental auditors

JF - Environmental Management (New York): an international journal for decision-makers, scientists and environmental auditors

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 4

ER -