Towards a more regional federalism

rural and urban attitudes to institutions, governance and reform in Australia

AJ. Brown, Ian Gray, Dimitria Giorgas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Governance reform is increasingly understood in terms of partnerships, flexibility and growth in the ' noninstitutionalised' forms of decision-making, but what do Australians make of the governmental institutions still so crucial to the theory and reality of governance? In Australian discussions about new spatial approaches to governance, this question is especially fundamental because in its relatively brief 200 year postcolonisation history, Australia has come to have an unusually centralised system of government. This article explores the attitudes of Australian citizens towards their existing key institutions of governance, in particular the federal political system in its various spatial and hierarchical dimensions. We present some key findings from a random sample survey of 502 New South Wales rural and urban residents in late 2005, building on an earlier survey of 301 Queensland residents undertaken in 2001. The surveys indicate attitudes towards the present system and preferences regarding change, including options from new states to stronger regional institutions within the current framework. Findings are reported against demographic and other characteristics, including levels of satisfaction with present systems. Interstate and urban-regional comparisons are made. We conclude that high popular interest in change, which transcends the 'urban-rural' divide to a much higher degree than anticipated, provides a strong basis for a more open and less partisan political debate about institutional reform than may have been possible for some decades.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)283-302
Number of pages20
JournalRural Society
Volume16
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

institutional reform
political system
decision making
history
Governance
Federalism
Residents
comparison
citizen
Queensland
Rural-urban
Political system
Decision making
Sample survey
Institutional reform
Government
Attitude survey
Demographics
Wales

Cite this

@article{648fa07c4e5e444ba479292cf32c4b77,
title = "Towards a more regional federalism: rural and urban attitudes to institutions, governance and reform in Australia",
abstract = "Governance reform is increasingly understood in terms of partnerships, flexibility and growth in the ' noninstitutionalised' forms of decision-making, but what do Australians make of the governmental institutions still so crucial to the theory and reality of governance? In Australian discussions about new spatial approaches to governance, this question is especially fundamental because in its relatively brief 200 year postcolonisation history, Australia has come to have an unusually centralised system of government. This article explores the attitudes of Australian citizens towards their existing key institutions of governance, in particular the federal political system in its various spatial and hierarchical dimensions. We present some key findings from a random sample survey of 502 New South Wales rural and urban residents in late 2005, building on an earlier survey of 301 Queensland residents undertaken in 2001. The surveys indicate attitudes towards the present system and preferences regarding change, including options from new states to stronger regional institutions within the current framework. Findings are reported against demographic and other characteristics, including levels of satisfaction with present systems. Interstate and urban-regional comparisons are made. We conclude that high popular interest in change, which transcends the 'urban-rural' divide to a much higher degree than anticipated, provides a strong basis for a more open and less partisan political debate about institutional reform than may have been possible for some decades.",
author = "AJ. Brown and Ian Gray and Dimitria Giorgas",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia. ISSNs: 1037-1656;",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "283--302",
journal = "Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia",
issn = "1037-1656",
publisher = "eContent Management Pty Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Towards a more regional federalism : rural and urban attitudes to institutions, governance and reform in Australia. / Brown, AJ.; Gray, Ian; Giorgas, Dimitria.

In: Rural Society, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2006, p. 283-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a more regional federalism

T2 - rural and urban attitudes to institutions, governance and reform in Australia

AU - Brown, AJ.

AU - Gray, Ian

AU - Giorgas, Dimitria

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: Journal title (773t) = Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia. ISSNs: 1037-1656;

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Governance reform is increasingly understood in terms of partnerships, flexibility and growth in the ' noninstitutionalised' forms of decision-making, but what do Australians make of the governmental institutions still so crucial to the theory and reality of governance? In Australian discussions about new spatial approaches to governance, this question is especially fundamental because in its relatively brief 200 year postcolonisation history, Australia has come to have an unusually centralised system of government. This article explores the attitudes of Australian citizens towards their existing key institutions of governance, in particular the federal political system in its various spatial and hierarchical dimensions. We present some key findings from a random sample survey of 502 New South Wales rural and urban residents in late 2005, building on an earlier survey of 301 Queensland residents undertaken in 2001. The surveys indicate attitudes towards the present system and preferences regarding change, including options from new states to stronger regional institutions within the current framework. Findings are reported against demographic and other characteristics, including levels of satisfaction with present systems. Interstate and urban-regional comparisons are made. We conclude that high popular interest in change, which transcends the 'urban-rural' divide to a much higher degree than anticipated, provides a strong basis for a more open and less partisan political debate about institutional reform than may have been possible for some decades.

AB - Governance reform is increasingly understood in terms of partnerships, flexibility and growth in the ' noninstitutionalised' forms of decision-making, but what do Australians make of the governmental institutions still so crucial to the theory and reality of governance? In Australian discussions about new spatial approaches to governance, this question is especially fundamental because in its relatively brief 200 year postcolonisation history, Australia has come to have an unusually centralised system of government. This article explores the attitudes of Australian citizens towards their existing key institutions of governance, in particular the federal political system in its various spatial and hierarchical dimensions. We present some key findings from a random sample survey of 502 New South Wales rural and urban residents in late 2005, building on an earlier survey of 301 Queensland residents undertaken in 2001. The surveys indicate attitudes towards the present system and preferences regarding change, including options from new states to stronger regional institutions within the current framework. Findings are reported against demographic and other characteristics, including levels of satisfaction with present systems. Interstate and urban-regional comparisons are made. We conclude that high popular interest in change, which transcends the 'urban-rural' divide to a much higher degree than anticipated, provides a strong basis for a more open and less partisan political debate about institutional reform than may have been possible for some decades.

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 283

EP - 302

JO - Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia

JF - Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia

SN - 1037-1656

IS - 3

ER -