Abstract

Sustainability of mining projects is linked to informed investment decisions based on public reporting of exploration and mineral resource estimation results. In Australia, guidelines for public reporting are established by the Joint Ore Reserves Committee reporting code through the JORC Code (2012). Although assessment of uncertainty in the results reported is a requirement, this is often communicated in a qualitative manner and subjectively evaluated. This can become a liability if not communicated effectively, particularly in early stages of mining projects when spatial domains of geological interpretation and mineralization envelopes influence reliability of resource estimates.

This review describes methodologies for quantitative uncertainty assessment and communication, and explores how they could be applied in public reporting practice. The complexity, cost and additional work of doing a quantitative assessment could hinder a straightforward implementation. This could be overcome if mining companies budget for quantitative uncertainty assessment and associated professional development. A compulsory requirement for inclusion of uncertainty assessments in public reporting or use of standardized subjective language would improve industry practice.
Original languageEnglish
Article number104098
Number of pages13
JournalOre Geology Reviews
Volume133
Early online date10 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 10 Mar 2021

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Uncertainty assessment of spatial domain models in early stage mining projects – a review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this