Understanding, assessing and enhancing student evaluative judgement in digital environments

Jason Lodge, Gregor Kennedy, John Hattie

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter (peer-reviewed)peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Students’ evaluative judgements of their progress while they work on a task rely on effective monitoring and decision-making. These ongoing processes occur in parallel with the calibrations students make when comparing their work against a goal. Laboratory-based research demonstrates that these processes are influenced by numerous factors, particularly in digital environments. While these environments may lead to students misjudging their progress, they also provide possibilities for better understanding, assessing and providing feedback and hints to students as they learn. In this way, digital learning environments afford intervention strategies for enhancing evaluative judgement beyond what is feasible in other contexts.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDeveloping evaluative judgement in higher education
Subtitle of host publicationAssessment for knowing and producing quality work
EditorsDavid Boud, Rola Ajjawi, Phillip Dawson, Joanna Tai
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter7
Pages70-78
Number of pages9
Edition1st
ISBN (Electronic)9781315109251
ISBN (Print)9781138089358, 9781138089341
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding, assessing and enhancing student evaluative judgement in digital environments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this