Understanding drivers of how to improve producer-led passive surveillance among smallholder livestock producers in Australia

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperConference paper

Abstract

Smallholder livestock producers are believed to pose higher risks for disease introduction and spread than commercial producers. One of the main reasons for this is an assumption that smallholders do not possess adequate level of knowledge of diseases, disease management and reporting. Knowledge is a key driver in influencing behaviour and is also a primary feature of passive disease surveillance. A cross-sectional study, using a postal survey (n=1140) and focus group discussions (n=28), was conducted to understand the animal health management and communication practices of smallholders keeping sheep, cattle, pigs, dairy goats and alpacas in Australia; practices that could influence the effectiveness of producer-led passive surveillance. Findings indicate that animal health management practices, such as contact with veterinarians and attitudes towards reporting could be improved, although over 80% of smallholders actively seek information on the health of their livestock. Private veterinarians have a vital role in improving passive surveillance among these producers, given they are the first point of contact in the event of unusual signs of disease and are considered trusted sources of information. In addition, most smallholders would also contact other producers for disease advice, and are less likely to contact government agencies. Among smallholders, emergency animal diseases are not a priority; however, these producers are concerned about the health of their animals. Strategies for improving awareness of disease and disease reporting responsibilities, using private veterinarians and producers as key stakeholders of a producer-led system, could improve the effectiveness of on-farm passive surveillance.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Animal Health Surveillance
Pages117-120
Number of pages4
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Event3rd International Conference on Animal Health Surveillance - Novotel Rotorua Lakeside Hotel, Rotorua, New Zealand
Duration: 30 Apr 201704 May 2017
http://www.animalhealthsurveillance.org/congress-history/about-icahs
http://www.animalhealthsurveillance.org/sites/default/files/domain-56/ICAHS3_programme_FINAL.pdf (conference program)
http://www.sciquest.org.nz/elibrary/edition/7613 (conference proceedings)

Conference

Conference3rd International Conference on Animal Health Surveillance
Abbreviated titleBeyond animal health surveillance
CountryNew Zealand
CityRotorua
Period30/04/1704/05/17
Internet address

Fingerprint

animal health
veterinarians
livestock
monitoring
government agencies
disease surveillance
alpacas
dairy goats
focus groups
animal diseases
information sources
cross-sectional studies
stakeholders
animal communication
disease control
sheep
farms
swine
cattle

Cite this

Hernandez-Jover, M., Hayes, L., Woodgate, R., Rast, L., & Toribio, J. -A. (2017). Understanding drivers of how to improve producer-led passive surveillance among smallholder livestock producers in Australia. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Animal Health Surveillance (pp. 117-120)
@inproceedings{3ba95a6baabc483d94d97249d2b833e6,
title = "Understanding drivers of how to improve producer-led passive surveillance among smallholder livestock producers in Australia",
abstract = "Smallholder livestock producers are believed to pose higher risks for disease introduction and spread than commercial producers. One of the main reasons for this is an assumption that smallholders do not possess adequate level of knowledge of diseases, disease management and reporting. Knowledge is a key driver in influencing behaviour and is also a primary feature of passive disease surveillance. A cross-sectional study, using a postal survey (n=1140) and focus group discussions (n=28), was conducted to understand the animal health management and communication practices of smallholders keeping sheep, cattle, pigs, dairy goats and alpacas in Australia; practices that could influence the effectiveness of producer-led passive surveillance. Findings indicate that animal health management practices, such as contact with veterinarians and attitudes towards reporting could be improved, although over 80{\%} of smallholders actively seek information on the health of their livestock. Private veterinarians have a vital role in improving passive surveillance among these producers, given they are the first point of contact in the event of unusual signs of disease and are considered trusted sources of information. In addition, most smallholders would also contact other producers for disease advice, and are less likely to contact government agencies. Among smallholders, emergency animal diseases are not a priority; however, these producers are concerned about the health of their animals. Strategies for improving awareness of disease and disease reporting responsibilities, using private veterinarians and producers as key stakeholders of a producer-led system, could improve the effectiveness of on-farm passive surveillance.",
keywords = "smallholder livestock producers, producer-led surveillance, communication networks",
author = "Marta Hernandez-Jover and Lynne Hayes and Robert Woodgate and Luzia Rast and J.-A Toribio",
year = "2017",
language = "English",
pages = "117--120",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Animal Health Surveillance",

}

Hernandez-Jover, M, Hayes, L, Woodgate, R, Rast, L & Toribio, J-A 2017, Understanding drivers of how to improve producer-led passive surveillance among smallholder livestock producers in Australia. in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Animal Health Surveillance. pp. 117-120, 3rd International Conference on Animal Health Surveillance, Rotorua, New Zealand, 30/04/17.

Understanding drivers of how to improve producer-led passive surveillance among smallholder livestock producers in Australia. / Hernandez-Jover, Marta; Hayes, Lynne; Woodgate, Robert; Rast, Luzia; Toribio, J.-A.

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Animal Health Surveillance. 2017. p. 117-120.

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperConference paper

TY - GEN

T1 - Understanding drivers of how to improve producer-led passive surveillance among smallholder livestock producers in Australia

AU - Hernandez-Jover, Marta

AU - Hayes, Lynne

AU - Woodgate, Robert

AU - Rast, Luzia

AU - Toribio, J.-A

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Smallholder livestock producers are believed to pose higher risks for disease introduction and spread than commercial producers. One of the main reasons for this is an assumption that smallholders do not possess adequate level of knowledge of diseases, disease management and reporting. Knowledge is a key driver in influencing behaviour and is also a primary feature of passive disease surveillance. A cross-sectional study, using a postal survey (n=1140) and focus group discussions (n=28), was conducted to understand the animal health management and communication practices of smallholders keeping sheep, cattle, pigs, dairy goats and alpacas in Australia; practices that could influence the effectiveness of producer-led passive surveillance. Findings indicate that animal health management practices, such as contact with veterinarians and attitudes towards reporting could be improved, although over 80% of smallholders actively seek information on the health of their livestock. Private veterinarians have a vital role in improving passive surveillance among these producers, given they are the first point of contact in the event of unusual signs of disease and are considered trusted sources of information. In addition, most smallholders would also contact other producers for disease advice, and are less likely to contact government agencies. Among smallholders, emergency animal diseases are not a priority; however, these producers are concerned about the health of their animals. Strategies for improving awareness of disease and disease reporting responsibilities, using private veterinarians and producers as key stakeholders of a producer-led system, could improve the effectiveness of on-farm passive surveillance.

AB - Smallholder livestock producers are believed to pose higher risks for disease introduction and spread than commercial producers. One of the main reasons for this is an assumption that smallholders do not possess adequate level of knowledge of diseases, disease management and reporting. Knowledge is a key driver in influencing behaviour and is also a primary feature of passive disease surveillance. A cross-sectional study, using a postal survey (n=1140) and focus group discussions (n=28), was conducted to understand the animal health management and communication practices of smallholders keeping sheep, cattle, pigs, dairy goats and alpacas in Australia; practices that could influence the effectiveness of producer-led passive surveillance. Findings indicate that animal health management practices, such as contact with veterinarians and attitudes towards reporting could be improved, although over 80% of smallholders actively seek information on the health of their livestock. Private veterinarians have a vital role in improving passive surveillance among these producers, given they are the first point of contact in the event of unusual signs of disease and are considered trusted sources of information. In addition, most smallholders would also contact other producers for disease advice, and are less likely to contact government agencies. Among smallholders, emergency animal diseases are not a priority; however, these producers are concerned about the health of their animals. Strategies for improving awareness of disease and disease reporting responsibilities, using private veterinarians and producers as key stakeholders of a producer-led system, could improve the effectiveness of on-farm passive surveillance.

KW - smallholder livestock producers

KW - producer-led surveillance

KW - communication networks

M3 - Conference paper

SP - 117

EP - 120

BT - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Animal Health Surveillance

ER -

Hernandez-Jover M, Hayes L, Woodgate R, Rast L, Toribio J-A. Understanding drivers of how to improve producer-led passive surveillance among smallholder livestock producers in Australia. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Animal Health Surveillance. 2017. p. 117-120