User preference for a control-based reduced processing decision support interfacedecision support interface and porter

Ben W. Morrison, Mark W. Wiggins, Glenn Porter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined trainee crime-scene investigators' preference for, and accuracy in using, four different computer-based decision support interface designs, each of which incorporated a different reduced processing information acquisition strategy. The interfaces differed on the basis of the number of options that could be considered simultaneously and the level of control that could be exercised over the number and sequence in which feature values were accessed. Forty trainee investigators completed six decision scenarios in which they were asked to acquire information and formulate a decision by selecting one of three options. The study comprised two phases, the first of which involved familiarizing participants with each of the four interface designs and collecting performance and subjective data. The second phase involved trainees selecting one of the four interfaces to engage in a fifth and sixth decision scenario involving high or low levels of time pressure. The results indicated that the "all options, full control" interface was the preferred option in the low time-pressure condition. Although the strategy remained the most frequently selected in the high time-pressure condition, this preference was not significant. It was concluded that the perceptions of difficulty and the degree of user control over information acquisition were more important than perceived efficiency in the selection of computer-based interface designs. The outcomes have implications for the design of decision support systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-316
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 01 Apr 2010

Fingerprint

trainee
Processing
Interfaces (computer)
Crime
scenario
Decision support systems
information processing
offense
efficiency
performance
time
Values

Cite this

@article{2d2b105085af4a469f4ddfa5752dd7ec,
title = "User preference for a control-based reduced processing decision support interfacedecision support interface and porter",
abstract = "This study examined trainee crime-scene investigators' preference for, and accuracy in using, four different computer-based decision support interface designs, each of which incorporated a different reduced processing information acquisition strategy. The interfaces differed on the basis of the number of options that could be considered simultaneously and the level of control that could be exercised over the number and sequence in which feature values were accessed. Forty trainee investigators completed six decision scenarios in which they were asked to acquire information and formulate a decision by selecting one of three options. The study comprised two phases, the first of which involved familiarizing participants with each of the four interface designs and collecting performance and subjective data. The second phase involved trainees selecting one of the four interfaces to engage in a fifth and sixth decision scenario involving high or low levels of time pressure. The results indicated that the {"}all options, full control{"} interface was the preferred option in the low time-pressure condition. Although the strategy remained the most frequently selected in the high time-pressure condition, this preference was not significant. It was concluded that the perceptions of difficulty and the degree of user control over information acquisition were more important than perceived efficiency in the selection of computer-based interface designs. The outcomes have implications for the design of decision support systems.",
author = "Morrison, {Ben W.} and Wiggins, {Mark W.} and Glenn Porter",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10447310903575465",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "297--316",
journal = "International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction",
issn = "1044-7318",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

User preference for a control-based reduced processing decision support interfacedecision support interface and porter. / Morrison, Ben W.; Wiggins, Mark W.; Porter, Glenn.

In: International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 26, No. 4, 01.04.2010, p. 297-316.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - User preference for a control-based reduced processing decision support interfacedecision support interface and porter

AU - Morrison, Ben W.

AU - Wiggins, Mark W.

AU - Porter, Glenn

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - This study examined trainee crime-scene investigators' preference for, and accuracy in using, four different computer-based decision support interface designs, each of which incorporated a different reduced processing information acquisition strategy. The interfaces differed on the basis of the number of options that could be considered simultaneously and the level of control that could be exercised over the number and sequence in which feature values were accessed. Forty trainee investigators completed six decision scenarios in which they were asked to acquire information and formulate a decision by selecting one of three options. The study comprised two phases, the first of which involved familiarizing participants with each of the four interface designs and collecting performance and subjective data. The second phase involved trainees selecting one of the four interfaces to engage in a fifth and sixth decision scenario involving high or low levels of time pressure. The results indicated that the "all options, full control" interface was the preferred option in the low time-pressure condition. Although the strategy remained the most frequently selected in the high time-pressure condition, this preference was not significant. It was concluded that the perceptions of difficulty and the degree of user control over information acquisition were more important than perceived efficiency in the selection of computer-based interface designs. The outcomes have implications for the design of decision support systems.

AB - This study examined trainee crime-scene investigators' preference for, and accuracy in using, four different computer-based decision support interface designs, each of which incorporated a different reduced processing information acquisition strategy. The interfaces differed on the basis of the number of options that could be considered simultaneously and the level of control that could be exercised over the number and sequence in which feature values were accessed. Forty trainee investigators completed six decision scenarios in which they were asked to acquire information and formulate a decision by selecting one of three options. The study comprised two phases, the first of which involved familiarizing participants with each of the four interface designs and collecting performance and subjective data. The second phase involved trainees selecting one of the four interfaces to engage in a fifth and sixth decision scenario involving high or low levels of time pressure. The results indicated that the "all options, full control" interface was the preferred option in the low time-pressure condition. Although the strategy remained the most frequently selected in the high time-pressure condition, this preference was not significant. It was concluded that the perceptions of difficulty and the degree of user control over information acquisition were more important than perceived efficiency in the selection of computer-based interface designs. The outcomes have implications for the design of decision support systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951284448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951284448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10447310903575465

DO - 10.1080/10447310903575465

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 297

EP - 316

JO - International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

JF - International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

SN - 1044-7318

IS - 4

ER -