Using Fictive Narrative to Teach Ethics/Philosophy

Michael Boylan, Felcia Nimue Ackerman, Gabriel Palmer-Fernandez, Sybol Cook Anderson, Edward Spence

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    What moves students to think philosophically? What does it mean to think philosophically? There is some disagreement on this, but fromthe point of view of teaching it must include a disposition to inquire about everything especially foundational principles concerning thegood, the true, and the beautiful. David Hume called this sort of temperament: mitigated skepticism. It has driven exploration into thecore areas of philosophy: ethics, epistemology, metaphysics, and logic. Socrates (a model for many of us in the Western tradition) calledhimself alternately a stingray and a midwife to describe his own teaching role in breeding and nurturing future philosophers and citizens of Athens. Following the example of Socrates, how can philosophers in today's classroom engage and stimulate students in just this manner so that they undergo enhanced capability to enter into the philosophical quest? Some choose a quasi-mathematical approach. These are the folk who position logic front and center in the enterprise. Most philosophers in the Anglo-American tradition feel some keen sensibility to this approach. There is something very central about logic and philosophy. But this is not the entire story. Logic is a necessary but not a sufficient condition in learning to think philosophically. There is more: harkening back to Socrates, 'the unexamined life is not worth living.' These words invoke both ethics as a sub-category to philosophy but they also call philosophers into the practical realm (including epistemology and metaphysics). Philosophers have to speak to the human condition in ways that regular people (such as our students) can understand. Philosophy is not just about some esoteric audience but is essentially exoteric with a message to all.To this end a group of us set-up an empirical study at a mix of universities to try to measure secondary outcomes (students reporting ontheir own learning experiences) in a class taught conventionally, for the most part, with the addition of fiction (five of the six institutions) and film (one of the six institutions). What we wanted to ascertain was what affect did fiction have in teaching philosophy within a traditional featuring direct discourse non-fictional works? Is the addition of fiction into the traditional setting positive? If so, then our study would be a beacon for structuring curricula: include some fiction within our traditional philosophy courses. What follows are the results of this study.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)61-94
    Number of pages34
    JournalTeaching Ethics: The Journal of the Society for Ethics across the Curriculum
    Volume12
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    Philosophy
    Teaching
    Fictive
    Philosopher
    Logic
    Fiction
    Socrates
    Epistemology
    Metaphysics
    Anglo-American
    Breeding
    Midwives
    David Hume
    Regular
    American Tradition
    Enterprise
    Disposition
    Skepticism
    Discourse
    Temperament

    Cite this

    Boylan, Michael ; Ackerman, Felcia Nimue ; Palmer-Fernandez, Gabriel ; Anderson, Sybol Cook ; Spence, Edward. / Using Fictive Narrative to Teach Ethics/Philosophy. In: Teaching Ethics: The Journal of the Society for Ethics across the Curriculum. 2011 ; Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 61-94.
    @article{47b33871389940c0ac15052777765a5d,
    title = "Using Fictive Narrative to Teach Ethics/Philosophy",
    abstract = "What moves students to think philosophically? What does it mean to think philosophically? There is some disagreement on this, but fromthe point of view of teaching it must include a disposition to inquire about everything especially foundational principles concerning thegood, the true, and the beautiful. David Hume called this sort of temperament: mitigated skepticism. It has driven exploration into thecore areas of philosophy: ethics, epistemology, metaphysics, and logic. Socrates (a model for many of us in the Western tradition) calledhimself alternately a stingray and a midwife to describe his own teaching role in breeding and nurturing future philosophers and citizens of Athens. Following the example of Socrates, how can philosophers in today's classroom engage and stimulate students in just this manner so that they undergo enhanced capability to enter into the philosophical quest? Some choose a quasi-mathematical approach. These are the folk who position logic front and center in the enterprise. Most philosophers in the Anglo-American tradition feel some keen sensibility to this approach. There is something very central about logic and philosophy. But this is not the entire story. Logic is a necessary but not a sufficient condition in learning to think philosophically. There is more: harkening back to Socrates, 'the unexamined life is not worth living.' These words invoke both ethics as a sub-category to philosophy but they also call philosophers into the practical realm (including epistemology and metaphysics). Philosophers have to speak to the human condition in ways that regular people (such as our students) can understand. Philosophy is not just about some esoteric audience but is essentially exoteric with a message to all.To this end a group of us set-up an empirical study at a mix of universities to try to measure secondary outcomes (students reporting ontheir own learning experiences) in a class taught conventionally, for the most part, with the addition of fiction (five of the six institutions) and film (one of the six institutions). What we wanted to ascertain was what affect did fiction have in teaching philosophy within a traditional featuring direct discourse non-fictional works? Is the addition of fiction into the traditional setting positive? If so, then our study would be a beacon for structuring curricula: include some fiction within our traditional philosophy courses. What follows are the results of this study.",
    keywords = "Fiction, Philosophy, Philosophy plays, Teaching philosophy",
    author = "Michael Boylan and Ackerman, {Felcia Nimue} and Gabriel Palmer-Fernandez and Anderson, {Sybol Cook} and Edward Spence",
    note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = Fall, 2011; Journal title (773t) = Teaching Ethics: The Journal of the Society for Ethics across the Curriculum. ISSNs: 1544-4031;",
    year = "2011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "61--94",
    journal = "Teaching Ethics: The Journal of the Society for Ethics across the Curriculum",
    issn = "1544-4031",
    publisher = "Philosophy Documentation Center",
    number = "1",

    }

    Boylan, M, Ackerman, FN, Palmer-Fernandez, G, Anderson, SC & Spence, E 2011, 'Using Fictive Narrative to Teach Ethics/Philosophy', Teaching Ethics: The Journal of the Society for Ethics across the Curriculum, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 61-94.

    Using Fictive Narrative to Teach Ethics/Philosophy. / Boylan, Michael; Ackerman, Felcia Nimue; Palmer-Fernandez, Gabriel; Anderson, Sybol Cook; Spence, Edward.

    In: Teaching Ethics: The Journal of the Society for Ethics across the Curriculum, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2011, p. 61-94.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Using Fictive Narrative to Teach Ethics/Philosophy

    AU - Boylan, Michael

    AU - Ackerman, Felcia Nimue

    AU - Palmer-Fernandez, Gabriel

    AU - Anderson, Sybol Cook

    AU - Spence, Edward

    N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = Fall, 2011; Journal title (773t) = Teaching Ethics: The Journal of the Society for Ethics across the Curriculum. ISSNs: 1544-4031;

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - What moves students to think philosophically? What does it mean to think philosophically? There is some disagreement on this, but fromthe point of view of teaching it must include a disposition to inquire about everything especially foundational principles concerning thegood, the true, and the beautiful. David Hume called this sort of temperament: mitigated skepticism. It has driven exploration into thecore areas of philosophy: ethics, epistemology, metaphysics, and logic. Socrates (a model for many of us in the Western tradition) calledhimself alternately a stingray and a midwife to describe his own teaching role in breeding and nurturing future philosophers and citizens of Athens. Following the example of Socrates, how can philosophers in today's classroom engage and stimulate students in just this manner so that they undergo enhanced capability to enter into the philosophical quest? Some choose a quasi-mathematical approach. These are the folk who position logic front and center in the enterprise. Most philosophers in the Anglo-American tradition feel some keen sensibility to this approach. There is something very central about logic and philosophy. But this is not the entire story. Logic is a necessary but not a sufficient condition in learning to think philosophically. There is more: harkening back to Socrates, 'the unexamined life is not worth living.' These words invoke both ethics as a sub-category to philosophy but they also call philosophers into the practical realm (including epistemology and metaphysics). Philosophers have to speak to the human condition in ways that regular people (such as our students) can understand. Philosophy is not just about some esoteric audience but is essentially exoteric with a message to all.To this end a group of us set-up an empirical study at a mix of universities to try to measure secondary outcomes (students reporting ontheir own learning experiences) in a class taught conventionally, for the most part, with the addition of fiction (five of the six institutions) and film (one of the six institutions). What we wanted to ascertain was what affect did fiction have in teaching philosophy within a traditional featuring direct discourse non-fictional works? Is the addition of fiction into the traditional setting positive? If so, then our study would be a beacon for structuring curricula: include some fiction within our traditional philosophy courses. What follows are the results of this study.

    AB - What moves students to think philosophically? What does it mean to think philosophically? There is some disagreement on this, but fromthe point of view of teaching it must include a disposition to inquire about everything especially foundational principles concerning thegood, the true, and the beautiful. David Hume called this sort of temperament: mitigated skepticism. It has driven exploration into thecore areas of philosophy: ethics, epistemology, metaphysics, and logic. Socrates (a model for many of us in the Western tradition) calledhimself alternately a stingray and a midwife to describe his own teaching role in breeding and nurturing future philosophers and citizens of Athens. Following the example of Socrates, how can philosophers in today's classroom engage and stimulate students in just this manner so that they undergo enhanced capability to enter into the philosophical quest? Some choose a quasi-mathematical approach. These are the folk who position logic front and center in the enterprise. Most philosophers in the Anglo-American tradition feel some keen sensibility to this approach. There is something very central about logic and philosophy. But this is not the entire story. Logic is a necessary but not a sufficient condition in learning to think philosophically. There is more: harkening back to Socrates, 'the unexamined life is not worth living.' These words invoke both ethics as a sub-category to philosophy but they also call philosophers into the practical realm (including epistemology and metaphysics). Philosophers have to speak to the human condition in ways that regular people (such as our students) can understand. Philosophy is not just about some esoteric audience but is essentially exoteric with a message to all.To this end a group of us set-up an empirical study at a mix of universities to try to measure secondary outcomes (students reporting ontheir own learning experiences) in a class taught conventionally, for the most part, with the addition of fiction (five of the six institutions) and film (one of the six institutions). What we wanted to ascertain was what affect did fiction have in teaching philosophy within a traditional featuring direct discourse non-fictional works? Is the addition of fiction into the traditional setting positive? If so, then our study would be a beacon for structuring curricula: include some fiction within our traditional philosophy courses. What follows are the results of this study.

    KW - Fiction

    KW - Philosophy

    KW - Philosophy plays

    KW - Teaching philosophy

    M3 - Article

    VL - 12

    SP - 61

    EP - 94

    JO - Teaching Ethics: The Journal of the Society for Ethics across the Curriculum

    JF - Teaching Ethics: The Journal of the Society for Ethics across the Curriculum

    SN - 1544-4031

    IS - 1

    ER -