Using insights from pragmatism to develop reforms that strengthen institutional competence for conserving biodiversity

Sarah Clement, Susan A Moore, Michael Lockwood, Michael Mitchell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The poor performance of biodiversity institutions has prompted calls for reform. Adaptive governance has been promoted as a means of supporting improved biodiversity outcomes. However, incorporating adaptive elements into biodiversity governance has been a challenge. In particular, efforts to make institutions more 'adaptive' often fail to account for existing capacity and context-specific factors. Clear guidance on how to move from general, ambitious adaptive governance prescriptions to specific, context-dependent recommendations is needed. This paper demonstrates how insights from pragmatism can inform an approach for designing institutional reforms that address current shortcomings in adaptive governance approaches. This design scaffolds reform options on a platform of existing competency and institutional legacy. Informed by the results of a prior institutional diagnosis, reform development followed a three-stage process: defining plausible reform spaces; identifying reform possibilities within these spaces; and elaborating reform options. Two very different landscapes provided the case studies: (1) a highly modified agricultural landscape, where private landholders are responsible for managing biodiversity as a public good; (2) a group of national parks, where the state holds primary responsibility. The reforms in the agricultural landscape build on successful landholder and organizational efforts to self-organize and pursue innovative solutions, while those for the protected area enable greater managerial discretion and address the challenges of working across multiple government jurisdictions. This context-driven approach draws on insights from pragmatism to provide guidance on the design of institutional reforms that meet the demands of adaptive governance in a way that is both systematic and realistic. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)463-489
Number of pages27
JournalPolicy Sciences
Volume48
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2015

Fingerprint

pragmatism
institutional reform
biodiversity
reform
governance
agricultural land
governance approach
agricultural landscape
protected area
national park
jurisdiction
new media
medication
responsibility
science

Cite this

@article{e6c3b8341b7348b39f322d6e2d489b98,
title = "Using insights from pragmatism to develop reforms that strengthen institutional competence for conserving biodiversity",
abstract = "The poor performance of biodiversity institutions has prompted calls for reform. Adaptive governance has been promoted as a means of supporting improved biodiversity outcomes. However, incorporating adaptive elements into biodiversity governance has been a challenge. In particular, efforts to make institutions more 'adaptive' often fail to account for existing capacity and context-specific factors. Clear guidance on how to move from general, ambitious adaptive governance prescriptions to specific, context-dependent recommendations is needed. This paper demonstrates how insights from pragmatism can inform an approach for designing institutional reforms that address current shortcomings in adaptive governance approaches. This design scaffolds reform options on a platform of existing competency and institutional legacy. Informed by the results of a prior institutional diagnosis, reform development followed a three-stage process: defining plausible reform spaces; identifying reform possibilities within these spaces; and elaborating reform options. Two very different landscapes provided the case studies: (1) a highly modified agricultural landscape, where private landholders are responsible for managing biodiversity as a public good; (2) a group of national parks, where the state holds primary responsibility. The reforms in the agricultural landscape build on successful landholder and organizational efforts to self-organize and pursue innovative solutions, while those for the protected area enable greater managerial discretion and address the challenges of working across multiple government jurisdictions. This context-driven approach draws on insights from pragmatism to provide guidance on the design of institutional reforms that meet the demands of adaptive governance in a way that is both systematic and realistic. {\^A}{\circledC} 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.",
keywords = "Adaptive governance, Biodiversity conservation, Institutional reform, Multifunctional landscapes, Private land conservation, Protected areas",
author = "Sarah Clement and Moore, {Susan A} and Michael Lockwood and Michael Mitchell",
note = "Includes bibliographical references.",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s11077-015-9222-0",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "463--489",
journal = "Policy Sciences",
issn = "0032-2687",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "4",

}

Using insights from pragmatism to develop reforms that strengthen institutional competence for conserving biodiversity. / Clement, Sarah; Moore, Susan A; Lockwood, Michael; Mitchell, Michael.

In: Policy Sciences, Vol. 48, No. 4, 12.2015, p. 463-489.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using insights from pragmatism to develop reforms that strengthen institutional competence for conserving biodiversity

AU - Clement, Sarah

AU - Moore, Susan A

AU - Lockwood, Michael

AU - Mitchell, Michael

N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - The poor performance of biodiversity institutions has prompted calls for reform. Adaptive governance has been promoted as a means of supporting improved biodiversity outcomes. However, incorporating adaptive elements into biodiversity governance has been a challenge. In particular, efforts to make institutions more 'adaptive' often fail to account for existing capacity and context-specific factors. Clear guidance on how to move from general, ambitious adaptive governance prescriptions to specific, context-dependent recommendations is needed. This paper demonstrates how insights from pragmatism can inform an approach for designing institutional reforms that address current shortcomings in adaptive governance approaches. This design scaffolds reform options on a platform of existing competency and institutional legacy. Informed by the results of a prior institutional diagnosis, reform development followed a three-stage process: defining plausible reform spaces; identifying reform possibilities within these spaces; and elaborating reform options. Two very different landscapes provided the case studies: (1) a highly modified agricultural landscape, where private landholders are responsible for managing biodiversity as a public good; (2) a group of national parks, where the state holds primary responsibility. The reforms in the agricultural landscape build on successful landholder and organizational efforts to self-organize and pursue innovative solutions, while those for the protected area enable greater managerial discretion and address the challenges of working across multiple government jurisdictions. This context-driven approach draws on insights from pragmatism to provide guidance on the design of institutional reforms that meet the demands of adaptive governance in a way that is both systematic and realistic. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.

AB - The poor performance of biodiversity institutions has prompted calls for reform. Adaptive governance has been promoted as a means of supporting improved biodiversity outcomes. However, incorporating adaptive elements into biodiversity governance has been a challenge. In particular, efforts to make institutions more 'adaptive' often fail to account for existing capacity and context-specific factors. Clear guidance on how to move from general, ambitious adaptive governance prescriptions to specific, context-dependent recommendations is needed. This paper demonstrates how insights from pragmatism can inform an approach for designing institutional reforms that address current shortcomings in adaptive governance approaches. This design scaffolds reform options on a platform of existing competency and institutional legacy. Informed by the results of a prior institutional diagnosis, reform development followed a three-stage process: defining plausible reform spaces; identifying reform possibilities within these spaces; and elaborating reform options. Two very different landscapes provided the case studies: (1) a highly modified agricultural landscape, where private landholders are responsible for managing biodiversity as a public good; (2) a group of national parks, where the state holds primary responsibility. The reforms in the agricultural landscape build on successful landholder and organizational efforts to self-organize and pursue innovative solutions, while those for the protected area enable greater managerial discretion and address the challenges of working across multiple government jurisdictions. This context-driven approach draws on insights from pragmatism to provide guidance on the design of institutional reforms that meet the demands of adaptive governance in a way that is both systematic and realistic. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.

KW - Adaptive governance

KW - Biodiversity conservation

KW - Institutional reform

KW - Multifunctional landscapes

KW - Private land conservation

KW - Protected areas

U2 - 10.1007/s11077-015-9222-0

DO - 10.1007/s11077-015-9222-0

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 463

EP - 489

JO - Policy Sciences

JF - Policy Sciences

SN - 0032-2687

IS - 4

ER -