Validation of the intelligibility in context scale for Jamaican creole-speaking preschoolers

Karla N. Washington, Megan M McDonald, Sharynne McLeod, Kathryn Crowe, Hubert Devonish

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To describe validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS; McLeod et al.,2012a) and ICS-Jamaican Creole (ICS-JC; McLeod et al., 2012b; Washington & Devonish Trans.) in a sample of typically-developing 3-to-6-year-old Jamaicans. Method : One-hundred and forty-five preschooler–parent dyads participated in the study. Parents completed the 7-item ICS (n = 145) and ICS-JC (n = 98) to rate children's speech intelligibility (5-point scale) across communication partners (parents, immediate family, extended family, friends, acquaintances, strangers). Preschoolers completed the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology (DEAP; Dodd, Hua, Crosbie, Holm, & Ozanne, 2006) in English and Jamaican Creole to establish speech-sound competency. For this sample, we examined validity and reliability (interrater, test–rest, internal consistency) evidence using measures of speech-sound production: (a) percentage of consonants correct, (b) percentage of vowels correct, and (c) percentage of phonemes correct. Result: ICS and ICS-JC ratings showed preschoolers were always (5) to usually (4) understood across communication partners (ICS, M = 4.43; ICS-JC, M = 4.50). Both tools demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = .91), high interrater, and test-retest reliability. Significant correlations between the two tools and between each measure and language-specific percentage of consonants correct, percentage of vowels correct, and percentage of phonemes correct provided criterion-validity evidence. A positive correlation between the ICS and age further strengthened validity evidence for that measure.
Conclusions: Both tools show promising evidence of reliability and validity in describing functional speech intelligibility for this group of typically developing Jamaican preschoolers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)750-761
Number of pages12
JournalAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Speech Intelligibility
speaking
Phonetics
Interpersonal Relations
Parents
evidence
parents
communication
extended family
Language
phonology
dyad
diagnostic
rating
language
evaluation
Group

Cite this

@article{513a6b539da54891929459a48bf59f55,
title = "Validation of the intelligibility in context scale for Jamaican creole-speaking preschoolers",
abstract = "Purpose: To describe validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS; McLeod et al.,2012a) and ICS-Jamaican Creole (ICS-JC; McLeod et al., 2012b; Washington & Devonish Trans.) in a sample of typically-developing 3-to-6-year-old Jamaicans. Method : One-hundred and forty-five preschooler–parent dyads participated in the study. Parents completed the 7-item ICS (n = 145) and ICS-JC (n = 98) to rate children's speech intelligibility (5-point scale) across communication partners (parents, immediate family, extended family, friends, acquaintances, strangers). Preschoolers completed the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology (DEAP; Dodd, Hua, Crosbie, Holm, & Ozanne, 2006) in English and Jamaican Creole to establish speech-sound competency. For this sample, we examined validity and reliability (interrater, test–rest, internal consistency) evidence using measures of speech-sound production: (a) percentage of consonants correct, (b) percentage of vowels correct, and (c) percentage of phonemes correct. Result: ICS and ICS-JC ratings showed preschoolers were always (5) to usually (4) understood across communication partners (ICS, M = 4.43; ICS-JC, M = 4.50). Both tools demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = .91), high interrater, and test-retest reliability. Significant correlations between the two tools and between each measure and language-specific percentage of consonants correct, percentage of vowels correct, and percentage of phonemes correct provided criterion-validity evidence. A positive correlation between the ICS and age further strengthened validity evidence for that measure. Conclusions: Both tools show promising evidence of reliability and validity in describing functional speech intelligibility for this group of typically developing Jamaican preschoolers.",
author = "Washington, {Karla N.} and McDonald, {Megan M} and Sharynne McLeod and Kathryn Crowe and Hubert Devonish",
note = "Includes bibliographical references.",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0103",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "750--761",
journal = "American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology",
issn = "1058-0360",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "3",

}

Validation of the intelligibility in context scale for Jamaican creole-speaking preschoolers. / Washington, Karla N.; McDonald, Megan M; McLeod, Sharynne; Crowe, Kathryn; Devonish, Hubert.

In: American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 08.2017, p. 750-761.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of the intelligibility in context scale for Jamaican creole-speaking preschoolers

AU - Washington, Karla N.

AU - McDonald, Megan M

AU - McLeod, Sharynne

AU - Crowe, Kathryn

AU - Devonish, Hubert

N1 - Includes bibliographical references.

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - Purpose: To describe validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS; McLeod et al.,2012a) and ICS-Jamaican Creole (ICS-JC; McLeod et al., 2012b; Washington & Devonish Trans.) in a sample of typically-developing 3-to-6-year-old Jamaicans. Method : One-hundred and forty-five preschooler–parent dyads participated in the study. Parents completed the 7-item ICS (n = 145) and ICS-JC (n = 98) to rate children's speech intelligibility (5-point scale) across communication partners (parents, immediate family, extended family, friends, acquaintances, strangers). Preschoolers completed the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology (DEAP; Dodd, Hua, Crosbie, Holm, & Ozanne, 2006) in English and Jamaican Creole to establish speech-sound competency. For this sample, we examined validity and reliability (interrater, test–rest, internal consistency) evidence using measures of speech-sound production: (a) percentage of consonants correct, (b) percentage of vowels correct, and (c) percentage of phonemes correct. Result: ICS and ICS-JC ratings showed preschoolers were always (5) to usually (4) understood across communication partners (ICS, M = 4.43; ICS-JC, M = 4.50). Both tools demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = .91), high interrater, and test-retest reliability. Significant correlations between the two tools and between each measure and language-specific percentage of consonants correct, percentage of vowels correct, and percentage of phonemes correct provided criterion-validity evidence. A positive correlation between the ICS and age further strengthened validity evidence for that measure. Conclusions: Both tools show promising evidence of reliability and validity in describing functional speech intelligibility for this group of typically developing Jamaican preschoolers.

AB - Purpose: To describe validation of the Intelligibility in Context Scale (ICS; McLeod et al.,2012a) and ICS-Jamaican Creole (ICS-JC; McLeod et al., 2012b; Washington & Devonish Trans.) in a sample of typically-developing 3-to-6-year-old Jamaicans. Method : One-hundred and forty-five preschooler–parent dyads participated in the study. Parents completed the 7-item ICS (n = 145) and ICS-JC (n = 98) to rate children's speech intelligibility (5-point scale) across communication partners (parents, immediate family, extended family, friends, acquaintances, strangers). Preschoolers completed the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology (DEAP; Dodd, Hua, Crosbie, Holm, & Ozanne, 2006) in English and Jamaican Creole to establish speech-sound competency. For this sample, we examined validity and reliability (interrater, test–rest, internal consistency) evidence using measures of speech-sound production: (a) percentage of consonants correct, (b) percentage of vowels correct, and (c) percentage of phonemes correct. Result: ICS and ICS-JC ratings showed preschoolers were always (5) to usually (4) understood across communication partners (ICS, M = 4.43; ICS-JC, M = 4.50). Both tools demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = .91), high interrater, and test-retest reliability. Significant correlations between the two tools and between each measure and language-specific percentage of consonants correct, percentage of vowels correct, and percentage of phonemes correct provided criterion-validity evidence. A positive correlation between the ICS and age further strengthened validity evidence for that measure. Conclusions: Both tools show promising evidence of reliability and validity in describing functional speech intelligibility for this group of typically developing Jamaican preschoolers.

U2 - 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0103

DO - 10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0103

M3 - Article

C2 - 28538961

VL - 26

SP - 750

EP - 761

JO - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

JF - American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

SN - 1058-0360

IS - 3

ER -