TY - JOUR
T1 - Volatile and sensory profiling of Shiraz wine in response to alcohol management
T2 - Comparison of harvest timing versus technological approaches
AU - Longo, Rocco
AU - Blackman, John W.
AU - Antalick, Guillaume
AU - Torley, Peter J.
AU - Rogiers, Suzy Y.
AU - Schmidtke, Leigh M.
N1 - Includes bibliographical references.
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - The aim of this study was to compare the volatile and sensory profiles of Australian Shiraz red wines produced by several methods to achieve alcohol concentrations of 10.5 and 13.5% v/v. These levels were considerably lower contents than the commercial wine (16-17% v/v) that was produced from this vineyard site. Wines were produced by: (i) harvest timing (19.3, 24 and 29.3 Brix); (ii) blending equal proportions of early harvest (19.3 Brix) and late harvest wines (29.3 Brix); and (iii) dealcoholization using reverse osmosis followed by a membrane contactor. Dealcoholization caused a significant loss of volatile compounds, particularly esters, while the blending treatment had an averaging effect on most analytes. Sensory descriptive analysis of treatments with 10.5% v/v alcohol showed that the perception of the herbaceous attribute was more intense in the early harvest wines in comparison to the dealcoholized wines, while those of dark fruit, raisin/prune, astringency and alcohol were lower. No sensory differences were found amongst the 13.5% v/v wines, except for alcohol. Sensory and compositional data were modelled by means of Common Dimension (ComDim) multi-block analysis and indicated which chemical components are important to the perceived wine sensory properties. Insights from this study will provide knowledge that may be applied to control or moderate both unripe sensory attributes in addition to a deficiency of ripe fruit aromas or mouthfeel characteristics in reduced-alcohol red wines.
AB - The aim of this study was to compare the volatile and sensory profiles of Australian Shiraz red wines produced by several methods to achieve alcohol concentrations of 10.5 and 13.5% v/v. These levels were considerably lower contents than the commercial wine (16-17% v/v) that was produced from this vineyard site. Wines were produced by: (i) harvest timing (19.3, 24 and 29.3 Brix); (ii) blending equal proportions of early harvest (19.3 Brix) and late harvest wines (29.3 Brix); and (iii) dealcoholization using reverse osmosis followed by a membrane contactor. Dealcoholization caused a significant loss of volatile compounds, particularly esters, while the blending treatment had an averaging effect on most analytes. Sensory descriptive analysis of treatments with 10.5% v/v alcohol showed that the perception of the herbaceous attribute was more intense in the early harvest wines in comparison to the dealcoholized wines, while those of dark fruit, raisin/prune, astringency and alcohol were lower. No sensory differences were found amongst the 13.5% v/v wines, except for alcohol. Sensory and compositional data were modelled by means of Common Dimension (ComDim) multi-block analysis and indicated which chemical components are important to the perceived wine sensory properties. Insights from this study will provide knowledge that may be applied to control or moderate both unripe sensory attributes in addition to a deficiency of ripe fruit aromas or mouthfeel characteristics in reduced-alcohol red wines.
KW - Common component specific weights analysis
KW - Polypropylene membrane
KW - Sensory descriptive analysis
KW - Sequential harvest
KW - Volatiles
KW - Wine alcohol-reduction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046728225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046728225&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.057
DO - 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.057
M3 - Article
C2 - 29803484
AN - SCOPUS:85046728225
SN - 0963-9969
VL - 109
SP - 561
EP - 571
JO - Food Research International
JF - Food Research International
ER -