What if Derrida was wrong about Saussure?

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter (peer-reviewed)

Abstract

By far the dominant reading of Saussure today is Derrida's.But what if Derrida was wrong about Saussure, or at least, if Derrida's reading was limited? What if, for example, Derrida went too far in incorporating Saussure within a "classical semiology, "which is itself of doubtful unity? Or if it were possible to separate phonocentrism from logocentrism? What if Saussure did not reproduce a transcendental signified, that is, a concept independent of language? What if Saussurean theory does not join a sign to a referent, or betray a nostalgia for presence?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationFerdinand de Saussure
Subtitle of host publicationCritical assessments of leading linguists. Volume III Saussure, structuralism and post-structuralism
EditorsJohn E. Joseph
Place of PublicationLondon, England
PublisherRoutledge
Pages196-204
Number of pages8
Volume3
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9780415465465
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Jacques Derrida
Nostalgia
Transcendental
Semiology
Logocentrism
Unity
Language
Referent

Cite this

Daylight, R. (2013). What if Derrida was wrong about Saussure? In J. E. Joseph (Ed.), Ferdinand de Saussure: Critical assessments of leading linguists. Volume III Saussure, structuralism and post-structuralism (1 ed., Vol. 3, pp. 196-204). [50] London, England: Routledge.
Daylight, Russell. / What if Derrida was wrong about Saussure?. Ferdinand de Saussure: Critical assessments of leading linguists. Volume III Saussure, structuralism and post-structuralism. editor / John E. Joseph. Vol. 3 1. ed. London, England : Routledge, 2013. pp. 196-204
@inbook{b1e497dacc404172be4bec68432d536b,
title = "What if Derrida was wrong about Saussure?",
abstract = "By far the dominant reading of Saussure today is Derrida's.But what if Derrida was wrong about Saussure, or at least, if Derrida's reading was limited? What if, for example, Derrida went too far in incorporating Saussure within a {"}classical semiology, {"}which is itself of doubtful unity? Or if it were possible to separate phonocentrism from logocentrism? What if Saussure did not reproduce a transcendental signified, that is, a concept independent of language? What if Saussurean theory does not join a sign to a referent, or betray a nostalgia for presence?",
author = "Russell Daylight",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780415465465",
volume = "3",
pages = "196--204",
editor = "Joseph, {John E.}",
booktitle = "Ferdinand de Saussure",
publisher = "Routledge",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "1",

}

Daylight, R 2013, What if Derrida was wrong about Saussure? in JE Joseph (ed.), Ferdinand de Saussure: Critical assessments of leading linguists. Volume III Saussure, structuralism and post-structuralism. 1 edn, vol. 3, 50, Routledge, London, England, pp. 196-204.

What if Derrida was wrong about Saussure? / Daylight, Russell.

Ferdinand de Saussure: Critical assessments of leading linguists. Volume III Saussure, structuralism and post-structuralism. ed. / John E. Joseph. Vol. 3 1. ed. London, England : Routledge, 2013. p. 196-204 50.

Research output: Book chapter/Published conference paperChapter (peer-reviewed)

TY - CHAP

T1 - What if Derrida was wrong about Saussure?

AU - Daylight, Russell

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - By far the dominant reading of Saussure today is Derrida's.But what if Derrida was wrong about Saussure, or at least, if Derrida's reading was limited? What if, for example, Derrida went too far in incorporating Saussure within a "classical semiology, "which is itself of doubtful unity? Or if it were possible to separate phonocentrism from logocentrism? What if Saussure did not reproduce a transcendental signified, that is, a concept independent of language? What if Saussurean theory does not join a sign to a referent, or betray a nostalgia for presence?

AB - By far the dominant reading of Saussure today is Derrida's.But what if Derrida was wrong about Saussure, or at least, if Derrida's reading was limited? What if, for example, Derrida went too far in incorporating Saussure within a "classical semiology, "which is itself of doubtful unity? Or if it were possible to separate phonocentrism from logocentrism? What if Saussure did not reproduce a transcendental signified, that is, a concept independent of language? What if Saussurean theory does not join a sign to a referent, or betray a nostalgia for presence?

M3 - Chapter (peer-reviewed)

SN - 9780415465465

VL - 3

SP - 196

EP - 204

BT - Ferdinand de Saussure

A2 - Joseph, John E.

PB - Routledge

CY - London, England

ER -

Daylight R. What if Derrida was wrong about Saussure? In Joseph JE, editor, Ferdinand de Saussure: Critical assessments of leading linguists. Volume III Saussure, structuralism and post-structuralism. 1 ed. Vol. 3. London, England: Routledge. 2013. p. 196-204. 50