What is health anyway? Perceptions and experiences of health and health care from socio-economically disadvantaged rural residents.

Julaine Allan, Patrick Ball, Margaret Alston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Health and well being is a human right but one which is experienced differently in different social circumstances. The divide between rich and poor in Australia is starkly apparent in health status statistics; the poorest Australians have the poorest health, and many live in rural Australia. However, little is known about financially deprived rural citizen's perceptions of their own health and their expectations of health care services. Exploratory in-depth interviews were conducted with eleven rural residents dependent upon government income support. Ten of the eleven participants had chronic health problems, and these were being addressed symptomatically. The children of the participants required interventions for a range of physical, emotional and mental problems. The participants relied on local services, and on these local practitioners to provide suitable interventions and to direct them to other services if required. They had minimal knowledge, control or choice in the type of intervention or outcomes. In this group, poor health was normalised and future health not considered. Those with most to gain from health promotion and prevention activities and social inclusion programs are unlikely to benefit because poor health is normalised. Concepts of good health, health literacy, informed consent, choice of intervention or practitioner are meaningless in this context of deprivation and rural location. These findings suggest the population who endure the burden of ill-health will be by-passed by current and popular public health techniques of health promotion because rural people with poor health have low expectations of their own health and health care; and health service providers have high expectations of the health and the rational choices of the population they serve. There is a major disconnect between the expectations of both.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-97
Number of pages13
JournalRural Society
Volume20
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

health care
health
Health
Residents
Healthcare
social inclusion
literacy
health status
human rights
health services
public health
income

Cite this

@article{a67c2b82638f4cd78788378d8f3761e9,
title = "What is health anyway?: Perceptions and experiences of health and health care from socio-economically disadvantaged rural residents.",
abstract = "Health and well being is a human right but one which is experienced differently in different social circumstances. The divide between rich and poor in Australia is starkly apparent in health status statistics; the poorest Australians have the poorest health, and many live in rural Australia. However, little is known about financially deprived rural citizen's perceptions of their own health and their expectations of health care services. Exploratory in-depth interviews were conducted with eleven rural residents dependent upon government income support. Ten of the eleven participants had chronic health problems, and these were being addressed symptomatically. The children of the participants required interventions for a range of physical, emotional and mental problems. The participants relied on local services, and on these local practitioners to provide suitable interventions and to direct them to other services if required. They had minimal knowledge, control or choice in the type of intervention or outcomes. In this group, poor health was normalised and future health not considered. Those with most to gain from health promotion and prevention activities and social inclusion programs are unlikely to benefit because poor health is normalised. Concepts of good health, health literacy, informed consent, choice of intervention or practitioner are meaningless in this context of deprivation and rural location. These findings suggest the population who endure the burden of ill-health will be by-passed by current and popular public health techniques of health promotion because rural people with poor health have low expectations of their own health and health care; and health service providers have high expectations of the health and the rational choices of the population they serve. There is a major disconnect between the expectations of both.",
keywords = "Open access version available, Health promotion and prevention, Health status, Income level, Rural health care, Social inclusion",
author = "Julaine Allan and Patrick Ball and Margaret Alston",
note = "Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = 2010; Journal title (773t) = Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia. ISSNs: 1037-1656;",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.5172/rsj.20.1.85",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "85--97",
journal = "Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia",
issn = "1037-1656",
publisher = "eContent Management Pty Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - What is health anyway?

T2 - Perceptions and experiences of health and health care from socio-economically disadvantaged rural residents.

AU - Allan, Julaine

AU - Ball, Patrick

AU - Alston, Margaret

N1 - Imported on 12 Apr 2017 - DigiTool details were: month (773h) = 2010; Journal title (773t) = Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia. ISSNs: 1037-1656;

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Health and well being is a human right but one which is experienced differently in different social circumstances. The divide between rich and poor in Australia is starkly apparent in health status statistics; the poorest Australians have the poorest health, and many live in rural Australia. However, little is known about financially deprived rural citizen's perceptions of their own health and their expectations of health care services. Exploratory in-depth interviews were conducted with eleven rural residents dependent upon government income support. Ten of the eleven participants had chronic health problems, and these were being addressed symptomatically. The children of the participants required interventions for a range of physical, emotional and mental problems. The participants relied on local services, and on these local practitioners to provide suitable interventions and to direct them to other services if required. They had minimal knowledge, control or choice in the type of intervention or outcomes. In this group, poor health was normalised and future health not considered. Those with most to gain from health promotion and prevention activities and social inclusion programs are unlikely to benefit because poor health is normalised. Concepts of good health, health literacy, informed consent, choice of intervention or practitioner are meaningless in this context of deprivation and rural location. These findings suggest the population who endure the burden of ill-health will be by-passed by current and popular public health techniques of health promotion because rural people with poor health have low expectations of their own health and health care; and health service providers have high expectations of the health and the rational choices of the population they serve. There is a major disconnect between the expectations of both.

AB - Health and well being is a human right but one which is experienced differently in different social circumstances. The divide between rich and poor in Australia is starkly apparent in health status statistics; the poorest Australians have the poorest health, and many live in rural Australia. However, little is known about financially deprived rural citizen's perceptions of their own health and their expectations of health care services. Exploratory in-depth interviews were conducted with eleven rural residents dependent upon government income support. Ten of the eleven participants had chronic health problems, and these were being addressed symptomatically. The children of the participants required interventions for a range of physical, emotional and mental problems. The participants relied on local services, and on these local practitioners to provide suitable interventions and to direct them to other services if required. They had minimal knowledge, control or choice in the type of intervention or outcomes. In this group, poor health was normalised and future health not considered. Those with most to gain from health promotion and prevention activities and social inclusion programs are unlikely to benefit because poor health is normalised. Concepts of good health, health literacy, informed consent, choice of intervention or practitioner are meaningless in this context of deprivation and rural location. These findings suggest the population who endure the burden of ill-health will be by-passed by current and popular public health techniques of health promotion because rural people with poor health have low expectations of their own health and health care; and health service providers have high expectations of the health and the rational choices of the population they serve. There is a major disconnect between the expectations of both.

KW - Open access version available

KW - Health promotion and prevention

KW - Health status

KW - Income level

KW - Rural health care

KW - Social inclusion

U2 - 10.5172/rsj.20.1.85

DO - 10.5172/rsj.20.1.85

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 85

EP - 97

JO - Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia

JF - Rural Society: the journal of research into rural and regional social issues in Australia

SN - 1037-1656

IS - 1

ER -