When definitions in practice do not align with the literature: defining emerging technologies in academic libraries

Helen Reid, Mary Anne Kennan

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

Introduction. This study explores the language and discourse used during the practice of learning about emerging technology within three university libraries with an aim of developing collective understanding and informing practice.
Method. An action research based approach was used; librarians participated in focus groups and maintained personal journals about their learning of 'emerging technologies'.
Analysis. Content analysis using a practice theory lens was carried out to investigate the language and discourse used to describe the term 'emerging technologies' and the examples of technologies understood as emerging by the participants.
Results. Participants described emerging technologies using both the technology-centric characteristics used within the research literature and also in a personal or contextual manner. There was no overarching, agreed upon understanding at any of the three libraries.
Conclusion.The lack of a collective understanding of the term 'emerging technologies' may impact on the uptake of learning about appropriate emerging technologies in academic libraries. Working towards a collective understanding of the term may assist in the development of practice architectures to support learning of appropriate emerging technologies.
LanguageEnglish
JournalInformation Research: an international electronic journal
Volume22
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

literature
learning
discourse
language
theory-practice
action research
content analysis
librarian
university
lack
Group

Cite this

@article{4989e3012ef24592b9555127e336dbd7,
title = "When definitions in practice do not align with the literature: defining emerging technologies in academic libraries",
abstract = "Introduction. This study explores the language and discourse used during the practice of learning about emerging technology within three university libraries with an aim of developing collective understanding and informing practice.Method. An action research based approach was used; librarians participated in focus groups and maintained personal journals about their learning of 'emerging technologies'.Analysis. Content analysis using a practice theory lens was carried out to investigate the language and discourse used to describe the term 'emerging technologies' and the examples of technologies understood as emerging by the participants.Results. Participants described emerging technologies using both the technology-centric characteristics used within the research literature and also in a personal or contextual manner. There was no overarching, agreed upon understanding at any of the three libraries.Conclusion.The lack of a collective understanding of the term 'emerging technologies' may impact on the uptake of learning about appropriate emerging technologies in academic libraries. Working towards a collective understanding of the term may assist in the development of practice architectures to support learning of appropriate emerging technologies.",
author = "Helen Reid and Kennan, {Mary Anne}",
year = "2017",
volume = "22",
journal = "Information Research",
issn = "1368-1613",
publisher = "Thomas Daniel Wilson",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - When definitions in practice do not align with the literature: defining emerging technologies in academic libraries

AU - Reid,Helen

AU - Kennan,Mary Anne

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Introduction. This study explores the language and discourse used during the practice of learning about emerging technology within three university libraries with an aim of developing collective understanding and informing practice.Method. An action research based approach was used; librarians participated in focus groups and maintained personal journals about their learning of 'emerging technologies'.Analysis. Content analysis using a practice theory lens was carried out to investigate the language and discourse used to describe the term 'emerging technologies' and the examples of technologies understood as emerging by the participants.Results. Participants described emerging technologies using both the technology-centric characteristics used within the research literature and also in a personal or contextual manner. There was no overarching, agreed upon understanding at any of the three libraries.Conclusion.The lack of a collective understanding of the term 'emerging technologies' may impact on the uptake of learning about appropriate emerging technologies in academic libraries. Working towards a collective understanding of the term may assist in the development of practice architectures to support learning of appropriate emerging technologies.

AB - Introduction. This study explores the language and discourse used during the practice of learning about emerging technology within three university libraries with an aim of developing collective understanding and informing practice.Method. An action research based approach was used; librarians participated in focus groups and maintained personal journals about their learning of 'emerging technologies'.Analysis. Content analysis using a practice theory lens was carried out to investigate the language and discourse used to describe the term 'emerging technologies' and the examples of technologies understood as emerging by the participants.Results. Participants described emerging technologies using both the technology-centric characteristics used within the research literature and also in a personal or contextual manner. There was no overarching, agreed upon understanding at any of the three libraries.Conclusion.The lack of a collective understanding of the term 'emerging technologies' may impact on the uptake of learning about appropriate emerging technologies in academic libraries. Working towards a collective understanding of the term may assist in the development of practice architectures to support learning of appropriate emerging technologies.

M3 - Article

VL - 22

JO - Information Research

T2 - Information Research

JF - Information Research

SN - 1368-1613

IS - 4

ER -