Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment

Kai M A Chan, Patricia Balvanera, Karina Benessaiah, Mollie Chapman, Sandra Diaz, Erik Gómez-Baggethun, Rachelle Gould, Neil Hannahs, Kurt Jax, Sarah Klain, Gary Luck, Berta Martín-López, Barbara Muraca, Bryan Norton, Konrad Ott, Unai Pascual, Terre Satterfield, Marc Tadaki, Jonathan Taggart, Nancy Turner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

606 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

A cornerstone of environmental policy is the debate over protecting nature for humans' sake (instrumental values) or for nature's (intrinsic values) (1). We propose that focusing only on instrumental or intrinsic values may fail to resonate with views on personal and collective well-being, or 'what is right,' with regard to nature and the environment. Without complementary attention to other ways that value is expressed and realized by people, such a focus may inadvertently promote worldviews at odds with fair and desirable futures. It is time to engage seriously with a third class of values, one with diverse roots and current expressions: relational values. By doing so, we reframe the discussion about environmental protection, and open the door to new, potentially more productive policy approaches.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1462-1465
Number of pages4
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume113
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this